The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Douglas Shawcross (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet either WP:GNG nor WP:Author. The sources cited are two paywalled local newspaper articles from a century ago and a citation to the single book that he wrote. A Google search of the author and of his book turns up only mirrors of this Wikipedia article; Google Books turns up only passing mention in lists and nothing to indicate any notability; Google Scholar turns up nothing whatsoever. Banks Irk (talk) 20:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Regarding the text and references added today: (1) myheritage com is not a reliable source - see numerous discussions of the comparable site, ancestry.com, at WP:RSN and (2) sources on his grandfather don't establish any notability for the subject of the article. Banks Irk (talk) 13:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:GNG and WP:NOTNERITED. This stub seems to highlight his relatives rather than him. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - does not meet WP:GNG. The only match I found in the Wikipedia Library was for a one-paragraph review of Nature and the Idealist in The Expository Times. Regards BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.