Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 March 21

< March 20
March 22 >

March 21

Category:World Premiere Plaza

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Main article Draft:World Premiere Plaza has been moved to draft space due to lack of sources. If Disney's plans come true, there will likely be sufficient sources in a couple of weeks, but for now we should probably delete this category. Chrisahn (talk) 23:27, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Millennia in the future

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:25, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Contains only a single subcategory; I think the others were cut in previous CfD's. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:51, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Broadcasters of the Green Bay Packers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:25, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT; similar categories were deleted Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 01:15, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this is for current and past broadcast stations of the Green Bay Packers. Not sure how this falls into WP:PERFCAT but open to renaming. Got nominated for deletion even before I filled it! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not a defining characteristic. The defining characteristic of these articles is that they are about media in Green Bay, and the articles are already categorized as such. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:52, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:People from Mölnlycke

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:25, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category with just entry. Lost in Quebec (talk) 19:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Woody Woodpecker film stubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There are only two other articles in the "Woody Woodpecker film stubs" category... OpalYosutebito (talk) 19:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Canadian socialists of Ukrainian descent

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 5#Category:Canadian socialists of Ukrainian descent

Category:Coke Studio (Pakistani TV program)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Seems to be the same category, but with different names --woodensuperman 11:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Cryptocurrency stubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated stub category. As always, stub categories require at least 60 articles in or under them, but this only had 23 articles in it when I first found it -- and after checking them and finding that several weren't even really stubs anymore, it now only has 17.
Further, cryptocurrency is one of those subject areas where Wikipedia is constantly battling self-promotional spam from every crypto evangelist and every new startup crypto exchange under the sun, so crypto-related articles see a higher than normal rate of spam deletion -- which means that even if 43 other cryptocurrency-related stubs could be found to populate this properly, it's still not at all clear that this would stay over 60 articles in any sustained or ongoing way, except perhaps if we could get it well beyond even 60 articles for cushioning room.
So the template is fine, as it can just upfile its entries into the parent category in the meantime, but there would need to be a lot more articles than this before a dedicated category was needed for them. Bearcat (talk) 21:55, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:39, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:University and college theatres in London

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: University and college theatres in London is a single-page category and thus appears to be WP:OCNARROW. I propose up-merging into just University and college theatres in England as the other parent category, Theatres in London by type, is a WP:CONTAINERCAT for types of theatre in London. University and college theatres in England currently has five pages and two categories (including the one proposed here for up-merger) so is not large enough to justify diffusion. Robminchin (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Creature actors

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 5#Category:Creature actors


Sayfo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of speedy discussion
@Place Clichy: The names "Assyrian genocide" and "Sayfo" were discussed here and here. buidhe might be of some help. Mugsalot (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mugsalot: I'm just saying this is too sensitive and unclear for speedy, and I suggest a full discussion at CfD. On a wider note, these discussions (which are far from unanimous consensus) seemed to be mostly concerned by some belligerent editing we have seen in the past about the Assyrian name, to which some seemed to prefer other terms like Aramean (a debate strangely apparently internal to the Swedish diaspora). However, this often contentious back-and-forth editing seems to have calmed down a lot on Wikipedia lately, as seen e.g. here or here. Place Clichy (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Place Clichy: fair enough let's do that - how do we do that? Mugsalot (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mugsalot: I should have pointed you to WP:CFD#HOWTO which explains that, sorry. Place Clichy (talk) 18:53, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Place Clichy: no worries, I've done that now. Mugsalot (talk) 11:21, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: WP:C2D. Main article is Sayfo. Mugsalot (talk) 11:18, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Place Clichy, User623921, Surayeproject3, and Buidhe: pinging contributors to speedy discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am strongly supporting a speedy renaming, I am also in favor for all three propositions:
User623921 (talk) 12:50, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
been 9 days without a WP:RM, is it safe to renaming the categories now? @Marcocapelle User623921 (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:1570s in Ottoman Syria

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This was previously kept at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_November_16#Ottoman_Syria, but its contemporary siblings were merged/deleted at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_March_8#16th–18th_century_Ottoman_Syria_categories, and it seems that this cat was omitted from that nomination as an oversight. Both member pages are already within both 157x establishments in the Ottoman Empire and 16th-century establishments in Ottoman Syria, so no merger is needed. – Fayenatic London 11:01, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Argentinosaurus

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Pointless category for a monotypic taxon, and pointlessly populated with a different genus and the parent family. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:57, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Events in Wikipedia history

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, the three subcategories have little in common except they are obviously part of Wikipedia culture. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Endings by decade until 1500

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
more categories nominated
Nominator's rationale:merge, at least up to the year 1500 this is a redundant category layer with only one or two subcategories (deaths and/or disestablishments). This is follow-up on this earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:27, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aidan721, LaundryPizza03, and Fayenatic london: pinging contributors to previous discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:28, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Masked actors

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 5#Category:Masked actors

Category:Algerian pulmonologists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry. Also merge with Category:Algerian physicians

Also proposing to merge:

Not really an argument for keep, the categories all listed above have only 1 entry and have been like that for sometime. LibStar (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
One of the main purposes of categories is to find similar articles. Having 1 entry is redundant. LibStar (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_March_21