User:Mojoworker

At some point I may actually add some narrative to my userpage.

Awards

wise cleanup

Thank you for quality articles on military history such as Battle of Pocotaligo, gnomish work on articles and fighting subtle vandalism, for illustrating "wise old thing" (with a ring to it), for working on cleanup in the tavern, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


The Guidance Barnstar
Dear Mojoworker, thanks for your kind words on my talk page, including your good faith and advice to make me a better Wikipedia editor. I wish the best to you and yours, AnupamTalk 16:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


The Civility Barnstar
yes Bondboy9756 (talk) 23:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


The Original Barnstar
thank you for turning the citations into same numbers, but how did you do that? Bondboy9756 (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)


The Citation Barnstar
Thanks for actually showing me how to cite my sources! NumbnessOfDestruction (talk) 10:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)


The Barnstar of Good Humor
Absolutely inspired :D ——SerialNumber54129 11:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Subpages


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 17:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online



3.23 RPM according to DeadbeefBot 21:52, 13 January 2026 (UTC)


Admin Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 71
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 5
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 26
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 7
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 294
Requested RD1 redactions 3
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 33
Open sockpuppet investigations 86
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports

  • ~2026-28004-0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). . DatBot (talk) 03:03, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Shekharactor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). . DatBot (talk) 03:22, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 2
Vandalism 0
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 1
Spam pages 21
LLM pages 4
Importance or significance not asserted 4
Possibly contested candidates 5
Other candidates 2
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Usernames for administrator attention


  • PlagueDoctor11 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "corona *virus|COVID|plague" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Griefing22 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "grief(er|ing)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file in gaming slang a "griefer" is an aggressive player that gets their kicks from disrupting others -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
    I've left them a message. Secretlondon (talk) 22:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Theawesomestguyin20267896435 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Username1100 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 14:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Bichar (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "bich" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Bich can be a Vietnamese name or an Anglo-Saxon surname - make sure this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Lhaterawalmonds (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "Used l instead of i attempting to skip filter: hate.... Violating string: ihaterawaimonds" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Please only block user if the name actually refers to hatred of other people or groups of people. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
  • HIPPAMONSTROSESQUIPADELIAPHOBIA (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:50, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:50, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Auditdude (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: (ltd|pty). Violating string: audltdude" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:30, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 07:30, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
  • MacRizz77 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "rizz" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:40, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
  • WyomingTheTophattedGoofyGoober (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Public bathrooms (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:00, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 05:00, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
  • DanielaDelgadilloWangxian (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
  • DJ MAHI RM OFFICIAL (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 18:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Garspunkel (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "spunk" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:30, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file UK slang for semen -- DQB (owner / report) 22:30, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Smellykatwiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "smell(y|s)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file the word "smelly" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 03:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
  • SelectL0L0L (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "Used 0 instead of o attempting to skip filter: l+o+l+o+l. Violating string: selectlolol" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
  • JackNewshamBusinessInsider (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:50, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:50, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
  • UniversityofOklahoma1897+ (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:00, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:00, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Georgekittlelooklikebenfranklin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Number 1 Natsi Hater (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "hate..." on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:40, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file Please only block user if the name actually refers to hatred of other people or groups of people. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:40, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
  • EncyclopedianOneTWoONeTwoOne (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
  • ScubaSteveOfTheUnderworld (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Shesoldseashellsbythecscior (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:30, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
  • ClinicalMentalHealthStudent2026 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:20, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:20, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
  • ChooseAGoodUsername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:30, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 21:30, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Kamalaroobini (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
    Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
    This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
    information Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 02:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

User-reported

  • Henningdiddyepsteinblud (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Disruptive username: Implying Jeffery Epstein/P Diddy All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:54, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Cine Tamil Talkies (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:29, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    @Jeraxmoira where have they promoted an entity named "Cine Tamil Talkies"? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:42, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    I believe they are promoting people who are affiliated with their entity. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. For a username to be blatantly promotional, there must be a link between the username and the user's edits. Consider re-reporting if a connection becomes clear through the user's edits. And/or file a report at WP:COIN if appropriate. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Wiki OFFICAL LATVIA (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)WP:MISLEADNAME, suggesting that it is the official account of the Latvian Wikipedia GGOTCC 23:15, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Aiseafuture (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See contribs. Lynch44 02:56, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Adding and re-adding multiple unsourced and WP:CRYSTAL claims + deleting templates Arjayay (talk) 11:48, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP (Temporary) editors.. Vestrian24Bio 16:12, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Sugar Tax (talk) 17:20, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Submitted for review by a temporary account a third time after being rejected twice and nominated for deletion. Please semiprotect against further editing by temporary accounts until MFD can be resolved. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:30, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Since semi-protection would block off all the editors working on the draft (i.e. not reverts of the AfC submissions) and the article is clearly just self-promotional, would it not make more sense to just delete the draft? If we protect it for more than six months than the article will probably be deleted for being dormant for six months. If we protect it for less than six months, than the same editors will be the only ones "working" on the draft anyways. Yue🌙 (talk) 19:18, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
My request evidently wasn't clear, User:Yue. The draft has already been nominated for deletion. I was asking to semi-protect the draft for seven days while the MFD is pending so that further tendentious resubmissions will not waste reviewer time while the draft is being deleted. I was asking to protect it for seven days, not for six months. After seven days it will be deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
I'll let another responding admin make the final call, but I think a speedy deletion would make more sense instead of leaving it in MfD for a week and protecting the draft during that period. Yue🌙 (talk) 19:40, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppetry. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙶𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝙴𝚙𝚒𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚢👁👄👁 (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: JacksonManionJ (talk · contribs) blocked by Yue. RunningOnBrains(talk) 00:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. tony 19:54, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Bushranger One ping only 02:55, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection. Ongoing IP vandalism, reverted several times by multiple editors. IP users warned. Request two week semi-protect. Msw1002 (talk) 21:07, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: ~2026-25206-8 (talk · contribs) blocked by Discospinster. Left guide (talk) 00:23, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Since the animated adaptation of his series has returned, multiple anons have edited the article with nonencyclopedic information or just bias. Users, on the other hand, should be free to edit. Tintor2 (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: This article has appeared 'in the news' and may have a higher risk of vandalism. BelowFlames (talk) 01:17, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note we don't preemptively protect pages that have a higher risk of vandalism, however there is actual vandalism on the page. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Reason: High level of recent anon vandalism. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 01:28, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Vandalism 3-days after block expried. Same stuff Adakiko (talk) 02:17, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. The Bushranger One ping only 02:52, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Temp account blocked to boot. Left guide (talk) 02:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. RedShellMomentum 02:36, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: ~2025-36238-32 (talk · contribs). The Bushranger One ping only 02:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Many temporary accounts making similar edits Jiltedsquirrel 🌰 (talk || contribs) 03:10, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left guide (talk) 03:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/anon user was banned for caste-cruft but they have returned to making their caste edits two weeks later. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 03:28, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/anon user was banned for caste-cruft but they have returned to making their caste edits two weeks later. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 03:29, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.

To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.

DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...

  • ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
    • If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
    • If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
  • ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.

You may request a protection reduction below if...

  • ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
  • ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
  • ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
  • ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.

If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here

Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.

Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.


I would like to put a protection notice with detailed information due to disruptive discussions that occured before the said protection:

  • {{Notice|image=Extended-protection-shackle.svg|1=This [[WP:TALK|talk page]] is currently under '''extended-confirmed protection''' due to edits that were generally [[WP:DISRUPTIVE|disruptive]]. If you cannot edit this page and want to request a specific edit, [[WP:RFED|make an edit request]] instead.}}

This notice would be removed the moment the XC protection expires.

Thanks. ~2026-26884-1 (talk) 09:12, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Here's the relevant text in the article:

> The Israeli government's response prompted international protests, arrests, and harassment.[835]

The relevant source:

> "2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Israel, West Bank and Gaza". US Department of State. 2023. Retrieved 10 June 2024.

The source is totally misrepresented (quite possibly by accident). It has nothing to do with international reactions; it actually reviews the abysmal state of human rights in Israel. Looks like a decent source that could be used elsewhere though. Also, I think the reference to "harassment" is quite vague, and should be dropped unless some source supporting it can be found.

Thanks very much for all your hard work. ~2026-27973-7 (talk) 22:20, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

4 protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
MediaWiki:Block-autoblock-exemptionlist (request) 2025-12-11 20:45 MediaWiki page (log)
Module:Coordinates (request) 2025-12-28 19:47 Fully protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2022-02-25: "1MM+ uses"
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist (request) 2026-01-09 08:04 MediaWiki page (log)
Wikipedia:Copyrights (request) 2026-01-11 23:40 Fully protected (log) From Wikipedia:Copyrights: Modified by Moonriddengirl on 2010-05-28: "I disagree. It was fully protcted in 2008 for its legal concerns."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:30, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
7 template-protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Location map (request) 2026-01-03 02:26 Template-protected (log) Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-03-11: "High-risk Lua module: requested at RfPP"
Template:External media (request) 2026-01-05 14:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:TCMDb name (request) 2026-01-05 23:46 Template-protected (log) From Template:Tcmdb name: Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Module:Infobox election (request) 2026-01-07 01:40 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2025-07-01: "High-risk template or module: 8960 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Article stub box (request) 2026-01-13 09:13 Template-protected (log) From Template:Asbox: Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Module:College color/data (request) 2026-01-13 14:32 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:TCMDb title (request) 2026-01-14 02:06 Template-protected (log) From Template:Tcmdb title: Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:07, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

I translate articles from other languages, usually from Chinese. I am an autoreviewer or autopatrolled on Chinese Wikipedia, English Wikivoyage, and Chinese Wikivoyage, and I have created 25 articles on English Wikipedia now. I am therefore interested in the right and believe that I am familiar with the policies and guidelines that autopatrolled may need on the English Wikipedia. Saimmx (talk) 12:17, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@Saimmx Why ae you interested in the userright? and I have created 25 articles on English Wikipedia now. I am therefore interested in the right seems odd for a userright that grants you no extra privileges (except I guess the ability to unreview your own pages). Sohom (talk) 18:19, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
@Saimmx: Thanks for the translation work you've been doing here on the English Wikipedia! However, I'm seeing a few quality issues in the articles you created last year. The sourcing on List of busiest passenger flight routes and List of busiest passenger flight routes in the 2010s is not ideal — there's quite a heavy reliance on primary sources for statistics, as well as on RoutesOnline, which seems to need more care in its usage based on this April 2025 RfC. Also, on Childhood (Tetsuya Takeda song), an anonymous editor had to fix quite a few translation and formatting errors that had crept in (diff). I haven't done a throuogh scan of your work, but these points seem to indicate that it would be beneficial for new pages patrol to continue reviewing your creations. (Non-administrator comment) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:24, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
  • (Non-administrator comment) I agree with @TechnoSquirrel69. Kitamura Sae bibliography still requires translation from Japanese to English, and was last edited a month ago. I can't locate the exact guideline/policy page, but English Wikipedia requires all articles to be written in English. This, among the other issues flagged by @TS69, suggests that your article creations should still be reviewed by NPP. Thank you for your translation contributions and happy editing! 11WB (talk) 18:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
  •  Not done * Pppery * it has begun... 03:22, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

I'd like to get AWB for finding and fixing typos on various articles. Nothing too specific, I've always had the nag of finding certain typos/errors that would be trivial to fix en masse with AWB. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 03:21, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request AWB access as I regularly add and amend maintenance categories to redirects and JavaScript Wiki Browser would streamline the process a lot. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 21:01, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Could I have my confirmed status restored? I am currently at 850 edits--502 are major edits. Dauntbares (talk) 16:43, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 16:50, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
 Not done this was just removed 10 days ago. The standard is that you will need 30 days and 500 constructive edits after a removal. Once you are at that point, come back. — xaosflux Talk 14:49, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Sorry, that wasn't explained to me. Dauntbares (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
You may follow up with the removing administrator to see if they want to work out something else with you. — xaosflux Talk 19:09, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

I meet every requirement but for some reason I don't have it. There is an error. Can I have EC? MrDenjiLover 🗣️ (Non-binary) 18:26, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Your account isn't quite a month old yet. The software will give you ECP automatically on your first edit after you meet the criteria - there's no need to manually ask. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

I would like to request an extension of my NPP reviewer rights. I have been reviewing pages cautiously and less frequently as I continue to build experience and ensure that my actions fully comply with policy. I expect my activity to increase as my confidence grows. Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Antoine le Deuxième as far as I can see, you've used the curation tool three times and you've manually patrolled 0 pages. Is there something else I should be basing my decision on? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:58, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
That's all for now, but I would like to patrol more articles as I get a better understanding of the rules. Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 14:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
 Done, I don't see any issue with extending for another month. signed, Rosguill talk 14:39, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 15:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Good day everyone, I am here today to place a request to be an New page reviewer. I have over 500 live mainspace edits and I have been a confirmed user since August 2025. I have had experience with writing, improving and having pages declined (which I then improved and learnt why they were declined), I have also have experience with AFD requests (which I have made a few when appropriate). I have also helped out at the Teahouse and helped other users with edits and drafts.

One of the main reasons why I would like to become an AFC reviewer is because I have seen an influx of what I call “Dud” articles, articles which don’t abide by Wikipedia’s rules, or aren’t notable (you see a lot on the Teahouse, and on the Draft list, articles about an individual, a family member or personal company), and I would like to help out in my spare time to clear up these articles and help with the backlog.

Thank you for reading. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 20:47, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
I'm inclined to grant a trial run, but KeyolTranslater, are you familiar with the differences between WP:AfC and WP:NPP? Just want to make sure you're applying for the right permission. signed, Rosguill talk 14:42, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Right after writing this request I realised I might’ve put my request in the wrong place, and so I read both pages again and I do realise that NPP is new pages, and AFC is drafts, and I think I have made a mistake, although wouldn’t mind helping both. Apologies if I have taken up our time. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 15:07, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
That's ok, just wanted to make sure you were clear on what you were signing up for.  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 17:59, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Thank you, I am honoured and shall help you all out. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! I'd like to request page reviewer rights - it's something I haven't really considered before, but spurred on by the backlog of women's biographies that need reviewing according to the Women in Red initiative. I have a good track record of creating/ improving articles to beyond stub level, and have been through the AFC process or supported new editors through the process both virtually-only and at in person wikithons that I lead or co-facilitate. I make clear to new editors if their ideas for new articles are not suitable (do not meet notability criteria, not enough sources), and support them to find other pages on-wiki where their well-sourced information can live. Thanks for considering me! Medievalfran (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Hello @Medievalfran! Your talk page shows you've had at least a couple of articles accepted through AfC, though Walter C. Leedy does have some sourcing issues, specifically WP:BLOGGER, which should not be used in biography articles like that one. You have no history at WP:AfD, I would highly recommend getting some experience there by participating in some discussions and !voting. Focusing on topics that interest you would be the easiest way to get involved! AfD history is one of the primary things administrators who grant NPR look for, as it can demonstrate knowledge of the relevant policies and guidelines that are important when reviewing articles. You say you've supported editors through AfC, this would demonstrate excellent experience, so I would recommend leaving some links here so the admins can take a look when they begin reviewing this request! Thanks for applying and good luck! 11WB (talk) 10:02, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 14:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I have been active in a multitude of articles across multiple different subjects. I have remained active for over 90 days and have edited articles more than 500 times. new page reviewer rights. I believe I will be a fair judge for the new articles coming in and give good feedback for said articles. CrazyMountainCreator (talk) 21:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 42 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 21:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
You appear to have 42 edits to mainspace and 91 edits total, which puts you well short of the minimum prerequisites.  Not done at this time. signed, Rosguill talk 14:47, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
I am currently an active AfC reviewer, and I would like to expand my efforts to the New Pages Feed to help maintain mainspace quality. Having the NPR right will allow me to seamlessly handle articles that bypass the AfC process. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎 08:34, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

Page mover

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Hi! I am a frequent RC patroller requesting PCR rights to get some new experience fighting vandalism. I often use RedWarn to easily take down vandals and getting a new way to help out the wiki would mean a lot to me :) Thanks for considering! akidfrombethany!(talk|contribs) 18:16, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I've been an editor on Wikpedia for about two years now, and I have a good grasp on the policies. I believe that I can be an efficient patroller of recent changes, and hopefully do a good job reverting vandalism across the website if given this right. Swoonfed (Ping) 23:24, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Hello. I am requesting rollback rights to combat vandalism in Wikipedia. I qualify to all the criteria mentioned above. I have been in monthly top five pending changes reviewer multiple times and I think if I have rollback rights, I can prevent vandalism even better and make Wikipedia a nicer place. Also, I have read the Wikipedia articles on rollback and reviewing changes thoroughly. TrueMoriarty (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

@TrueMoriarty although it's not directly relevant to rollback, I'm concerned about your very recent brush with copright (cc Diannaa). Is there anything you can say about that that would make me more comfortable? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:22, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
@HJ Mitchell. Hello. I deeply regret what occurred about that copyright issue, but believe me, my intentions were not bad. It was purely an accident and here’s what really happened. It is slightly troublesome to change tabs repeatedly while creating an article, so I copy-pasted the whole thing in my sandbox, where I thought I would peacefully take information from the article in question to the article I was creating. While creating the article, I was fully aware of copyright, notability, style and other guidelines but at that certain moment I was under considerable mental pressure and I accidentally mistook some paragraphs of the copy-pasted article as written by me so I just gave references and published it. It was kind of a mix-up. Like my paragraphs were there and so were the paragraphs of the copy-pasted articles and I accidentally deleted mine and kept the copy-pasted ones. Once again, I apologize sincerely for my mistakes and I hope I will be forgiven and be given rollback rights. Have good day!TrueMoriarty (talk) 07:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

After reading WP:Rollback, I believe it would be more efficient to have the rollback permission, although I am not super active on WP sometimes (whether it's the RC patrol or just making articles.) Themonkey942 (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I’ve been patrolling recent changes for about a year now, and I’ve always used Twinkle. I think it would improve my efficiency in reverting vandalism to have access to AntiVandal, which is why I request rollback rights.

Thanks! Shadestar474 (they/he) (talk) 02:14, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Welcome back! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:45, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:45, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi! I'm trying to use WP:KIWF and MassRoolback scripts to revert a block evasion, but both scripts didn't worked. I suppose that with this permission I will can perform some useful tasks. I'm aware of rules around it and will not abuse the tools. Thanks! Ixocactus (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I regularly patrol recent changes and I would love to have more tool access for better counter-vandalism efficiency. Jiltedsquirrel 🌰 (talk || contribs) 23:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

I am requesting rollback rights because I want to be able to continue and help with the fight against vandalism. Recently, I have become more aware of the tools out there used to assist someone in reviewing recent change logs and being able to quickly fix vandalism. Most if not all of these tools require rollback permissions. I understand if one may be hesitant to grant due to my past but I can assure you that I have working hard to prove that I am here to edit in good faith and help to keep Wikipedia safe and reliable. If possible, I would like these rights to be granted (even if I need to go under a trial to prove I am not going to abuse). Thank you, AirmanKitten203 (talk) 03:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([3]) and has 37 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 03:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
I have more main-space edits than that. AirmanKitten203 (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) AirmanKitten203, you can see your edits by namespace on xtools, where it says you have 37 mainspace contributions. Any edits in talk:, wikipedia:, draft:, user:, etc are not counted towards this number. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 15:13, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
 Not done; per the box at the top we would like to see at least 200 mainspace edits. Giraffer (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Alright, thank you. I didn't realize that it didn't count. AirmanKitten203 (talk) 15:34, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Frequent RC patroller, I'd like rollback so I can fight vandals even harder than I do now! Thanks ^^ akidfrombethany!(talk|contribs) 18:12, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Reason for requesting rollback rights Would like to try out WikiShield to see if it will improve the experience of RC patrol G Zhong 18:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I have been involved with stopping vandalism whenever I see it. I make sure to warn the vandal as soon as I can. I am well versed in the policies and will not abuse the privilege. Thank you for your time. Dafootballguy (talk) 03:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

I should begin by saying I'm not even sure this is the right action to take. I don't see myself needing to edit high-risk templates, work in sandboxes, or answer edit requests. However, several much more "ordinary" templates are protected nowadays, and I feel sufficiently established I don't want to bother others with relatively trivial changes, such as textual changes that don't require mastery of wiki or lua code. I do feel confident I won't accidentally wreck things. If you reading this really think we still live in an ideal world where only templates that would otherwise need full protection have template protection, then you should deny this request. Otherwise, I can think of maybe one instance every other month where I just left something alone even though having this right would enable to quickly fix something small, with next to no risk. Cheers, CapnZapp (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Can you provide some examples of successful requests and examples of changes you'd make if you had the user right? voorts (talk/contributions) 17:59, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Requests for temporary account IP viewer

Temporary account IP viewer

I was granted the permission in November until the 1st of January, and would like to re-request it. I utilised it a few times when monitoring vandals who were using numerous temporary accounts, and would like to continue to have access to the tool for future anti-vandalism efforts. I continue to understand the relevant policy and will follow it at all times when viewing the IPs of temporary accounts. Thanks, echidnalives - talk - edits 09:11, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 09:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)