Technetium is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 2, 2005.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 27, 2005 Peer review Reviewed May 3, 2005 Featured article candidate Promoted January 25, 2010 Featured article review Kept
Current status: Featured article

This  level-4 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elements Top‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 365 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

• R. C. L. Mooney (1948). "Crystal structure of element 43". Acta Cryst. 1 (4): 161–162. doi:10.1107/S0365110X48000466.
• Schwochau K. (1948). "The Present Status of Technetium Chemistry". Radichimica Acta. 21 (1–3): 139–152.
• Berlyn, Graeme P.; Dhillon, Sukhraj S.; Koslow, Evan E. (1980). "Technetium: A toxic waste product of the nuclear fuel cycle: Effects on soybean growth and development". Environmental Management. 4 (2): 149. doi:10.1007/BF01866511.

The article states that Technetium is found in the Periodic Table "between" Molybdenum and Rhenium. Although that is technically true, the article later states that Technetium is "adjacent" to these two elements. That is not accurate. Technetium is immediately "adjacent" to Molybdenum and Ruthenium in the Periodic Table. Rhenium is to the right of Ruthenium. 96.224.252.16 (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@96.224.252.16 Sorry for the error. l carelessly confused Molybdenum with Manganese, and Rhodium with Rhenium. Please disregard my foolish mistake. 96.224.252.16 (talk) 20:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The references to "the Noddacks" in the "Irreproducible Results" paragraph makes sense only to those who know that Walter Noddack married Ida Tacke in the next year (1926); some clarification might be useful here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.170.225.138 (talk) 01:37, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I found disputes in which isotope(s) of technetium were discovered first. Is it ^95mTc and ^97mTc^[1], or ⁹⁹Tc^[2]? Either way, ⁹⁷Tc and ⁹⁹Tc in the article isotopes of technetium, and ^95mTc and ⁹⁷Tc in the article technetium are incorrect. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 08:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The latter reference, given its purpose, should normally be considered the better source for isotope discoveries. But it this case it is complicated, and probably both are right. I wouldn't make a final decision before looking at the original papers from the 1930s, which are paywalled. But here's what seems to be the truth: the first samples of Tc worked with had been made by irradiation of natural molybdenum by protons or deuterons, and were no doubt a mixture of isotopes. Identification as a new element was made by its chemical properties, so the mixture did not matter. It is likely that the first half-lives to be measured were those of 95m and 97m given their value, but the first definite identification of any activity with a mass number was 99m, whose decay by IT allowed the long-lived ground state 99 to be inferred (Thoennessen's compilations do not distinguish isomers). I may change those for now until someone is able to look at those papers and decide the most appropriate wording. 2601:441:8500:B870:DC98:AD98:BDF9:4D9B (talk) 03:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]