The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 02:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St. Elizabeth Ann Seton School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Non-notable school which fails the proposed notability guideline of WP:SCHOOL. Tarret 00:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep I think it passes WP Schools Killerhun00 00:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Which part of the extremely generous WP:SCHOOLS does it pass? JChap2007 02:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • • The part that says all schools are inherently notable, LOL! Denni ^talk 19:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but clean up. Encise 00:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Encise[reply]
  • Comment Any reason for keeping? JoshuaZ 23:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, NN private elementary school. --humblefool® 00:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, NN elementary school with no sources. Shimeru 00:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable, unsourced, private (so it doesn't even meet the "keep all schools because they serve a public service" criteria), rather newly-opened (so it doesn't pass the ridiculous 50-year criterion) elementary school. -- Kicking222 01:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• comment Just because a school is private doesn't mean that it does provide a public service. -- Librarianofages 01:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • And just because a school exists doesn't mean it's notable. -- Kicking222 03:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep All schools are inherently notable, including this one -- Librarianofages 01:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • No they aren't, schools have to proove why they are notable. TJ Spyke 04:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Any explanation of why all schools are notable would be appreciated. JoshuaZ 15:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Whack it with a ruler No reliable sources in the article and I could not find any. JChap2007 02:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete However it can be listed on the page for List of private schools in Oklahoma. Missvain 03:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable school. TJ Spyke 04:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:SCHOOL. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 07:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Interesting Terence, last week you were telling me that all schools are inherently notable. Delete per WP:School Amists ^{talk • contribs} 11:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no schools are notable, especially not this one! Xtifr _tälk 09:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails criteria WP:SCHOOL, has 480 students- I went to one that had 2000 and I'd vote delete on it for the same reason.--John Lake 19:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Utterly fails WP:SCHOOLS3. "All schools are inherently notable" is an opinion, not a fact. Denni ^talk 19:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Make it go sit in the corner - Non-notable, fails WP:SCHOOL, WP:V, and WP:NOT. And I couldn't find anything on it either. --Elaragirl^Talk|Count 20:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Elaragirl: does not assert notability. Moreschi 21:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, asserted as a notable Catholic school in Oklahoma. --Vsion 04:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Please see our article on proof by assertion. JChap2007 20:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Show me some sources and then we'll talk. RFerreira 05:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Searching for info on the school is not easy since multiple schools seem to have this name. I was unable to confirm the claim that the school is "the largest Catholic elementary school in the state of Oklahoma" which might constitute a weak claim of notability if true. Aside from that I can find no evidence of notable alumni, no evidence of clubs or teams performing at a notable level nor any other claim that could confer notability. JoshuaZ 23:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Week Keep Largest Catholic school in a distinctly non-Catholic area is a claim of notability. Article needs expansion to provide addition context. Alansohn 01:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails pretty much any notability guideline, adopted or not. Expanded it and we'll talk. Trusilver 02:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Elizabeth Ann Seton and perhaps place a footnote that this school is named in her honour. There is also a school of the same name in Alaska, otherwise I would have suggested redirect to Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City. I don't see how this school is meets WP:SCHOOLS by it's own merits. Redirect discourages recreation! Movementarian (Talk) 10:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. WMMartin 17:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep notable school!!! Audiobooks 21:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Is there some basis to that claim at all? Adding exclamation marks doesn't make the claim any more persuasive. JoshuaZ 21:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.