The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Wizardman 12:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Hills Middle School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

non-notability Chris 12:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless reliable third-party sources with substantial coverage can be found. Jakew 13:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable. --Fang Aili ^talk 15:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, doesn't have the pretty-much-automatic notability of a high school, nothing else notable about it. Realkyhick 17:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Realkyhick Bfigura ^(talk) 21:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete That looks to be just the typical local middle school.--JForget 23:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There's plenty of precendent for school articles, even middle schools. -- BlastOButter42 ^See Hear _Speak 03:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply, yes, when they are notable, but your WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS argument doesn't stand by itself. Can you provide some other reason? Chris 04:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Twenty Years 08:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.