The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daveydweeb (^chat/_review!) 08:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Los Cerritos Middle School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Not a encyclopedia worthy article. No signifigance other than the schools website Supersean 06:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: While schools have a pretty good record surviving AfD, I don't think this one should stay unless real notability is asserted. All this article seems to provide is a mundane description of a nondescript middle school. Heimstern Läufer 07:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral I tend to agree, except that Wikipedia is chock full of these school articles; why this one. Akihabara 07:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I really think Wikipedia should have a lot fewer school articles than it does, but I'm certainly not going to go around hunting them and nominating them for deletion. For now, I'm just concerned with this one. Heimstern Läufer 07:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep Unless there is a general move to remove all schools based on notability criteria, I don't believe it is fair to single out this one. This page is not even in the lower middle of current school articles on WP. TSO1D 14:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete the worst kind of non-notable school cruft, half of it is unitelligible, fails WP:SCHOOL. NeoFreak 19:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But that's not official policy yet. TSO1D 00:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This true but it makes sense to me (my vote being my opinion) and last I checked WP:V, WP:OR and WP:N were. All of which this article fails. Then again that's just my opinion. On the topic of "unfairly" targeting this school, well editors trying to clean up wikipedia can't be everywhere at once. Right now I'm working my way through one topic myself and after that I'll move on to another. NeoFreak 02:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unsourced, no claim to notability, POV, attack page elements. Fails WP:SCHOOLS3 and WP:SCHOOLS. I don't think there's even anything that can be salvaged to merge -- the name of the school is already mentioned at the locality's article. Shimeru 06:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non notable school as per WP:SCHOOLS3 - and I'll be one of the ones working at culling out all of the nn schools when SCHOOLS# becomes a policy :) SkierRMH,07:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- unencyclopedic, unverifiable, unsourced. Article contains no assertion of notability of any kind. --Kuzaar^-T-C- 15:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Eusebeus 01:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Conejo Valley Unified School District, no reason not to. Silensor 05:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:SCHOOLS3 on the assertions in the article. Also fails to have any sources in the article. Also has major content flaws, but those aren't why it should be deleted - not asserting notability and not using sources are the reasons. GRBerry 23:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not to badly written if it's by a current student, but certainly doesn't establish notability. Eluchil404 15:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to its school district. I can't find anything approaching notability and no sources that do anything other than give the address of the school. JoshuaZ 15:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.