The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, primary schools are not considered notable on WP. Prod was removed by author, so sent to AfD HumbleGod 22:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.--blue520 23:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Colleges are notable, some high schools are notable, but primary schools aren't inherently notable unless they did something remarkable besides exist. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 00:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, verifiable. JYolkowski // talk 02:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Not a valid reason to keep anything. Proto///type 10:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth --JJay 20:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge a summary sentence into Sutton-in-Ashfield. — RJH (talk) 02:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to Sutton-in-Ashfield. RFerreira 03:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, redirect to Sutton-in-Ashfield (where it's already mentioned) to dissuade from recreation. Merge, delete, either, just do not keep. Proto///type 10:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable primary school, no wikilinks and doesn't link to anything except AFD. Catchpole 11:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not all schools are notable no matter what some people say. Carlossuarez46 20:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and allow for organic growth. Notability is not a requirement for inclusion. Bahn Mi 20:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. While notability may not be a requirement for inclusion, being encyclopedic is. Nothing in this article indicates any encyclopedic value. Agent 86 21:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for reasons articulated at Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. As I understand it, elementary schools are notable and should be kept if we ever want to become the sum of all human knowledge. Silensor 17:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Silensor and Bahn Mi. --Myles Long 20:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep even though/although Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep was voted down, its still a very valid argument to keep. JJay is right, our threshold is verifiability, not notability.  ALKIVAR™ 21:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep More notable than Star Wars weapons. Osomec 20:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please this information is important and verifiable too Yuckfoo 01:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Sutton-in-Ashfield. The amount of human knowledge represented by directory listing of elementary schools is miniscule indeed. Eluchil404 07:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Enough said. Since merges are counted as a keep, those are wasted votes to delete the article. Vegaswikian 05:20, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable school Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable. McPhail 16:11, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Nice stub that could do with some expansion. That takes time - certainly more than the 3 minutes provided to the author before it was tagged for deletion. --JJay 16:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable school - primary schools are not inherently notable nor do they have the place in the community of high schools. This school asserts no notability. BlueValour 23:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.