Hello, Themashup, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

PamD 07:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Literary_Hub#Book_Marks_italic .. I'm advocating italicized, like most websites. Homed in the |work= or |website= field, where it is automatically italicized. It should also be wikilinked in the citation such as: Special:Diff/1275442650/1275443097

I removed something here Special:Diff/1275429649/1275442650 .. these consensus opinions since they don't tell you much. For example I notice book reviews on Amazon.com tend towards 4.4 on average (a high number nearly meaningless) while those on LibraryThing tends toward about 3.8 on average - a significant departure purely on which website the reviews are. And nobody knows what "Rave" means, in this context on Wikipedia, it reads like exaggeration. It could be more informative to say "..3 were positive, 4 mixed, and 1 negative". -- GreenC 02:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Italicized is a fantastic change. The consensus is useful for books with over 10 reviews such as "The Underground Railroad" with 32 reviews. For books with 5 such as "The Martian", I agree that the consensus is not helpful. Themashup (talk) 02:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Website names don't generally get italics, see IMDb and Facebook. The exception are (online) newspapers such as The Guardian and The Onion, but Book Marks is not a newspaper, so I don't think italics can be justified here. Gawaon (talk) 09:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me. Themashup (talk) 10:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sea Is My Brother, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The St. Petersburg Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Changing My Mind- Occasional Essays.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Embassy of Cambodia.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]