This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Firearms Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Add Mexico in users, both Army and Navy use it, it even shows on The Wikipedia pages of Both Mexican Army and Navy equipment 189.174.238.255 (talk) 08:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. BilCat (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1734783

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Army 189.174.238.255 (talk) 06:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of these are reliable sources. Please review the above link you were provided carefully, it already explains why. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 08:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As the title said : source related to rate of fire is linked to a 404 page. 2A02:A03F:B17C:3000:D97D:A49D:B2F0:DF02 (talk) 13:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved and/or moot... the live PDF and the archive link both worked fine for me just now.... - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:55, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Term Automatic is correct. "fully Automatic" is a redundant civilian term. The selectors on weapons say: safe-Semi-Auto" or "Safe-Semi-Burst". Full automatic is like describing a car's transmissions "fully auto". Wrong. It is Automatic or Semi Automatic (paddle shift), or Manual. 2600:1011:A03F:D546:F999:20ED:598B:FB0C (talk) 16:42, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Select fire: "semi-automatic, fully automatic, and/or burst mode"

It's just a way to differentiate unambiguously between semi-automatic and (fully) automatic. (Hohum ^@) 17:31, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• And burst mode, which is automatic but limited to 3 rounds fired. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:40, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is so confidently wrong, it's humorous. All branches of service within the DoD use the term "fully automatic". You can literally pick up the TM for maintaining the M4A1, it's right there under "Equipment Characteristics, Capabilities and Features": The M16 series rifles and M4 series carbines are lightweight weapons. They are air-cooled, gas-operated, and magazine fed. They have a semiautomatic, burst fire capacity, or full automatic fire." Thanks for playing, better luck next time. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 19:18, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It should be in the millions built not 500k 2600:1700:1DC6:5810:A8C3:AE0E:8E4:464A (talk) 17:21, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reliable source for this number? - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]