The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis V. Cordoba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability per WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. A costume designer relatively unknown films. Note IMDB is not a reliable source per WP:RS/IMDB, and the author of the IMDB biography has only created that one article, which may indicate affiliated source. In any case, significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources is lacking. --Animalparty! (talk) 01:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It is in poor form to nominate for deletion so soon after an article was created. Did you contact the editor who made the article? Did you do WP:Before? I think the AfD page makes it clear that sending an article for deletion is the last step out of many. Note: I am not saying the article does or even will pass GNG at this point. What I am saying is give things time and first assume good faith, do research and contact the creator. You had no time to do any of these and that's not right. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did a diligent search of sourcing before nominating and performed all steps of WP:BEFORE with the exception of notifying the creator, and for that I may be guilty of biting a newcomer. I will strive to be more patient with new articles in the future. I welcome Thefilmdiary to provide any additional information or sources, and regardless of the outcome of this discussion I hope they continue to participate in Wikipedia. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Animalparty! I appreciate you seeing my point of view. Let's all work together to help newer editors understand notability so we can keep people who want to contribute. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 13:45, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  05:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete A7 User:Megalibrarygirl may want to check her facts again as there was 6 hours between creation and nomination that is plenty of time for the author to have added at least one reliable reference, anyone to perform their BEFORE searches and realize this person does meet any inclusion criteria including WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. There isn't even enough of a claim of signifigance to pass the CSD#A7 criteria you removed without explaining. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 11:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I maintain that six hours is not enough time, Mcmatter. We are losing editors by acting too quickly, instead of reaching out. You put up the speedy delete tag, I believe. Did you write anything on the user's talk page to help them out? Megalibrarygirl (talk) 13:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Also, you are right, Mcmatter that I forgot to add the explanation for removing your tag. I'm sorry! My reason is: article is already up for AfD, let's see what a group can turn up. I want you to give the article time. There may be experts in the field. I don't know anything about costume design, do you? We need some other eyes out there.Megalibrarygirl (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not seem to meet the "significant coverage" part of our general notability guidelines. While this individual may be talented, it does not appear that in their, thus far, short career they have received the level of attention and coverage that would warrant their inclusion in an encyclopedia. EricSerge (talk) 14:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister talk 04:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -While I agree that a new editor should be given time to improve an article about a notable person, and definitely should be contacted about their article, Cordoba just doesn't have enough coverage in reliable sources. ABF99 (talk) 04:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment @MBisanz:Why was this relisted? consensus is clear, there was one user complaining that 6 hours wasn't enough time to add a reliable reference and asked for more time and 7 days is definitely enough time especially since by this point a BLPProd would have it deleted as well as it has zero reliable references. All other votes have been delete.McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no reliable sources, and costume designers are all too run of the mill in film. May be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Bearian (talk) 21:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.