The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was merge to Channel bonding#Broadband. J04n(talk page) 10:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broadband_bonding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reasons for deletion:

1. Couldn't find any reliable sources for the topic (Notability requires that verifiable evidence be provided)
2. It looks like an advertisment of some single product feature (not a standard or common feature) (Propaganda or advertising)
3. The single link in "references" seems to be broken

--Morkow (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• redirect This is a notable topic (sources are probably more common as "DSL bonding" or "channel bonding"), however we have almost no content either here or at channel bonding. There's also a case that a simply clearer article can be written under the broader scope of channel bonding. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge/redirect to Channel bonding#Broadband per Andy. —Ruud 12:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge/redirect to Channel bonding#Broadband as suggested above. I agree the encyclopedia should include some discussion of bonding, but this article is overly specific. Plus, it smells a bit spammy, I just can't quite put my finger on exactly why. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 22:24, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge/redirect to Channel bonding#Broadband Though it's already on the channel bonding page, merging this information (not a copy paste over existing info)with that would provide more information/clarity to that section of the channel bonding article. Karverstudio 17:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.