The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 17:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bayfair Shopping Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NBUILDING ("Buildings, including private residences, transportation facilities and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability.") Boleyn (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I've added a few references detailing it's redevelopment in the late 2010s, and am satisfied that it is significant in-depth coverage. —Panamitsu (talk) 00:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This isn’t just a collection of corner stores. It’s a massive mall, as big as they come in NZ. Schwede66 17:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep more sources exist. Can be improved. --Tumbuka Arch (talk) 09:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: repeated coverage in the NZ Herald establishes notability. Owen× ☎ 15:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.