Hi Mjkr234! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 16:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Teddy Pahagbia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and no sources on the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 16:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mjkr234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teddy Pahagbia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mjkr234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Teddy Pahagbia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:26, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mjkr234. Thank you for your work on Olasubomi Aina. Another editor, ZyphorianNexus, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ZyphorianNexus}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 16:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Elliot M. Zimmerman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NenChemist (talk) 14:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Avgeekamfot were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elliot M. Zimmerman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Avgeekamfot (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mjkr234! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Avgeekamfot (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:REFBOMB and WP:PYRAMID. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 10:36, 13 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Hi @Spinster300

Thank you for your feedback. Could you kindly clarify which specific aspects of WP:REFBOMB and WP:PYRAMID you are referring to in my article? I understand the concerns about citation overkill and the inverted pyramid style, and I am happy to make adjustments. The reason I included multiple references to The Florida Bar Journal is to provide a comprehensive record of Zimmerman's consistent recognition over several years, which I felt was important to accurately reflect his career. I am open to consolidating these references into a single citation if that resolves the issue. I would greatly appreciate your guidance on how best to address these points and move forward with publication. Thank you again for your assistance.

Kind regards, Mjkr234 (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elliot M. Zimmerman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 10:36, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Elliot M. Zimmerman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because per WP:PAID you are bound to use WP:AFC. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gheus (talk) 08:50, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a paid editor, you cannot move drafts to mainspace. You are bound to use WP:AFC (it is not optional), so please don't violate WP:PAID again. Similarly, don't edit mainspace articles when you have COI - use Wikipedia:Edit requests. Thank you. Gheus (talk) 08:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:PAID: you are required to disclose your external accounts. Paid editors must provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services. Please comply with this requirement as well. Thank you. Gheus (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gheus,

Thank you for your message. I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding or concern caused by my recent edits. I certainly had no intention of violating any Wikipedia guidelines, and I genuinely appreciate your dedication to maintaining the integrity of the platform.

Regarding the recent changes, I made the edits in good faith, aiming to improve the content by removing what I believed to be promotional material. However, I noticed that the changes were reverted, and I would greatly appreciate it if you could kindly review them again. My intent was purely to ensure that the article adhered to Wikipedia's guidelines and to maintain neutrality.

I fully understand the importance of complying with WP:PAID and WP:AFC, and I will be more mindful of this in the future. If there’s anything I missed or could improve in my approach, I’m more than happy to make the necessary adjustments.

Thank you again for your guidance, and I look forward to your feedback. Mjkr234 (talk) 09:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mjkr234 Thank you. Please follow Wikipedia:Edit requests process and resubmit your COI edits. I or any other volunteer may review and edit the article for you. Gheus (talk) 09:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please also disclose how you are getting these paid jobs? Gheus (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elliot M. Zimmerman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:29, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mjkr234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elliot M. Zimmerman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mjkr234. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Elliot M. Zimmerman".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]