Howdy. If you look through many of the US Congress pages leading up to the 117th US Congress page where both the Senate prez & prez pro-tempore images are shown? You'll find that the President of the Senate is placed above the President pro tempore of the Senate. This is done, because one outranks the other. GoodDay (talk) 22:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was a tiny few, that I had to fix up. Somebody messed them up, over the last few months & I hadn't noticed, until checking them over today. GoodDay (talk) 23:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They have not yet clinched home field all the way through, but if the Bills lose then they would. Why is this any less relevant than any other time we have list a scenario for clinching home field? LarryJeff (talk) 02:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LarryJeff (talk) 02:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning! In regards to your edit to Template:2022–23 NFL playoffs, that divisional game the Chiefs are playing in will absolutely be played in KC. They are the 1 seed, even if they might play a neutral site game in the Championship game. In the divisional round, they will play the lowest seed remaining, so there's no way the Bills could possibly be their opponent before the Championship game. In other words, the NFL's decision about home field in the AFC this year, will not affect that divisional game. --DB1729^talk 14:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Day Jdavi333,

We are disrupted editing of List of presidential trips made by Joe Biden (2023), because of adding necessary spacing content of the page of BOT USER (2600:4040:2cbd:7600:cda6:d548:be44:1fe0) (more adding space content). I hope will kindly STOP adding the spacing content.

Thank you. Rvreyes 11 (talk) 00:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure why the person keeps adding space. If it doesn’t stop we’ll have to apply for semi protection for a few days. Jdavi333 (talk) 02:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jdavi333 we are AGAIN disrupted editing of adding spacing and revise of details of the trip. I hope kindly STOP to disrupted editing or the semi protection of the page.

Thank you. Rvreyes 11 (talk) 01:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 United States Senate elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Baltimore Orioles season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Angelos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Jdavi333, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:02, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 119th United States Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second cabinet of Donald Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jdavi333, you seem to have been more active recently on more pages than I have, so rather than undoing your recent edit here to List of federal judges appointed by Donald Trump I thought I'd raise it here. During Trump's first term, there was extensive discussion about how to order nominees on the page throughout the nomination and confirmation process. (I don't think you were part of those discussions back then, but you can find them in the archives of the article's talk pages.) As far as I recall, at that time the decision was to organize all unconfirmed nominations first by date of nomination and then alphabetically by last name, ignoring any other factors, like committee status. (I think there may also have been some movement of names to the top of the list preemptively once votes were actually scheduled.) Based on that past practice, I would not expect us be moving names around based on what one senator said in a floor speech. All of that said, I don't know whether some other practice developed during the Biden administration on the page for his nominations, or if there's something else I'm missing here. Would appreciate your perspective and thoughts. Cheers! LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 23:25, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Russia–United States summit. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:29, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wanted to explain my undoing of your undoing of my edit in the edit summary but published it without meaning to: the Per Curiam opinions indeed appear first in an Order List, but are afterwards posted on the "Opinions" page of the Supreme Court website (as they are currently). BloubDeFontenilles (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Jdavi333. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:10, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Jdavi333. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 11 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EAKI78 was:

This is still practically an empty and useless list. It should be submitted when there is content to it rather than future planned trips that may or may not happen.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of presidential trips made by Donald Trump (2026) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– EAKI78 - Contact 18:01, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jdavi333! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – EAKI78 - Contact 18:01, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jdavi333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Russia–United States summit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]