Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Traumatic Livelihood. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #60.

Launchballer 02:25, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Higher Than Heaven is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 18:44, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Stickymatch 05:36, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Higher Than Heaven has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 02:01, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Love + Fear is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 00:47, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Love + Fear has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 02:05, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Hipal (talk) 17:55, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipal The page we edited was an album's article, not a biography. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 18:18, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Carrie Underwood discography is BLP info, but I'm not aware of any general consensus on how such carve-out articles are treated, and I know there is leeway for sources in such cases as WP:CITINGIMDB indicates for the use of IMDB. --Hipal (talk) 18:30, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I believe TheRichest can be a reliable source. I recently checked its About Us page and found that its company was Valnet Inc. and it doesn't contain advertise contents.( Once I tried to replace it when I wasn't aware of that source, but I failed to do so.) Camilasdandelions (talk!) 18:33, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for focusing on the content. Again, my apologies for the alert.

I've provided details at Talk:Carrie_Underwood_discography#TheRichest_is_unreliable. --Hipal (talk) 18:58, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RedShellMomentum 21:59, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 333 (Tinashe album) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:49, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me the thought process behind this funny edit Twister Swagger (talk) 13:23, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Twister Swagger We'd better share thoughts in here. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 13:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just realised I made an edit at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents that removed some of your edits - I was editing an old version of the page after you'd revised some comments. The diff is here [1] if you'd like to see what I removed/want to paste them back - sorry about that! Becsh (talk) 18:38, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Pink - Trustfall.mp3. However, there is a concern that the use of the file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the film may not meet, can be obtained by going to the file description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the file description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the file page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 09:21, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Camilasdandelions. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Somewhere".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 01:26, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Camilasdandelions! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How to deal with user who ignores discussion?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that the credits as stated in the article do not match the liner notes on my copy of the CD. Do you (or whoever added the source) have alternative liner notes? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'll find another sources for it. Thank you for letting me know. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 22:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Indila - Love Story.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've been thinking about checking your nomination for a possible support, can you please also see the one I put there months ago with only one response? (and given you worked on Britney articles, the only thing stopping a topic on her greatest hits albums is I'm a Slave 4 U, I've been considering editing there and wonder if you could help) igordebraga ≠ 02:24, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Igordebraga Hello! Yeah I saw your Madonna's FA nomination too, and I was thinking about supporting it. And I can help you for I'm Slave 4 U article. (Even tho I'm not that professional at finding old sources... I'll give it a try.) Camilasdandelions (talk!) 03:16, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Camilasdandelions. Thank you for your work on Touch & Go (Tinashe and 6lack song). Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This is well written, however it is a bit light on critical reception. A few more reviews to expand that section would be great!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 05:53, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Camilasdandelions. Thank you for your work on Destiny (Ellie Goulding song). Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This needs a critical reception section!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 05:56, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Camilasdandelions. Thank you for your work on The Devil Is Human. Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Images should be placed on the right side of the article per MOS:IMAGELOC. I have removed the image as there isn't enough room at the moment anyway. This needs to be expanded with a critical reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 05:59, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Camilasdandelions. Thank you for your work on Mind Reader (Mimi Webb and Meghan Trainor song). Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This needs a critical reception section to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 06:02, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw you removed my Here For It All edit about the recording span. I looked through her other album recording spans and all of them are unsourced so I am curious as to why you removed specifically mine. Thanks ~2026-11311-2 (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as I created Here for It All article, I'm specifically focusing on that article. I didn't aware that her other album articles also have unsourced recording dates, thanks for letting me know. I'll check them soon, and I'll remove them if they're unsourced. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 15:27, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If they have been there for so long, do not remove them. People know (including me) when these were recorded, and for example I know for a FACT that HFIA was recorded from August 2021 (if you check, the Clark Sisters stated they recorded Jesus I Do in August 2021) to 2025. ~2026-11311-2 (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No. Then put reliable source for it, otherwise, those stuffs should me deleted. Camilasdandelions (✉️) 00:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Good Girl (Carrie Underwood song) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Good Girl (Carrie Underwood song) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering if you could help me with Stockholm (Chrissie Hynde album) (since it's part of Women in Music) so that I can bring it up to GA. RedShellMomentum 21:42, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]