Talk:Nickelodeon

Could we split this into a new article called NickMusic?

I don’t think Nick and NickMusic should be in the same article. 2601:18C:601:C720:1D7A:F4FB:D3BD:DE4E (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting proposal

I suggest we split this into a new article called NickMusic 2601:18C:601:C720:79B2:C0DE:4DAF:530A (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NickMusic is not notable enough for an individual article. The section does not even have sources. WOndering-FLowers (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blank and redirect proposal for Nick in the Afternoon page

I propose blanking and redirecting the Nick in the Afternoon page to Nickelodeon#Former. Another editor has flagged the NITA page for lacking citations for verifications. I've performed a literature search and don't think there are enough citations to warrant a standalone page--I believe it would fail a notability/verification test and there is justification to delete. However, there are a variety of wikilinks to the page, so I think rather than deleting, the page just redirect to the programming block section on this page. Any opinions? Geethree (talk) 20:44, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]