Archive 10

←

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

→

Archive 20

Hi, the list is at FLC. Looking forward to your comments here. Regards, Zia Khan 21:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Meena Kandasamy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Agne^Cheese/^Wine 22:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I just knew that you are also a reviewer. I want to take Parineeti Chopra to GA. Would you take a look and tell me how is it and your comments and some suggestions. Then, I would love to nominate in coming days. Thank You.Prashant talk 10:14, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

I was interested in that article and thought of taking it to GAN, but eventually lost interest. It has nicely developed since then and looks okay to me. ATB for GAN! —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:18, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Would you please suggest some changes for the benefit of the article. They are more than welcome. Please, give me some comments over it. Some beneficial suggestions or some ideas for its improvement. Thank You.Prashant talk 02:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey! Well I have nominated the article for GA. Please, comment on the talk page and participate in the review. Thank you.Prashant talk 19:30, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

You cannot ask someone to review an article. Moreover, this isn't an FAC where a group of editors participate in the review. It will be definitely reviewed by someone in due course of time. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 03:54, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

As someone who participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jilla, you may be interested in participating in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jilla (film). -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

thanks for the barnstar :-) Karnan is probably the first Sivaji Ganesan film article to become a GA i guess. Puthiya Paravai and Parasakthi will also become soon i hope. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Best wishes for your future projects. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:30, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey Vensatry! Yeah, it's been a long time. I'm good, thank you, I hope you too are. Yes, actually an IP user found the link, was very surprised to see that it's still working. I too tried to access the "past winners" section, but vainly. Chances are low, but I'm still hoping that Filmfare or the Times Group will set up an official page for the Southern awards and publish a list of the past winners. Johannes003 (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

I have renominated it for GA. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 05:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to say, I don't have energy taking up GARs at the moment. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 11:49, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

I do not understand what u r saying. sometimes i assess articles myself because to avoid bothering other editors by giving them work, and bcoz i find the articles well written. Now have i assessed any article incorrectly? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

You shouldn't re-assess articles which are created/massively expanded by you. You seem to rate this article as B-class. You don't have to worry bothering other editors as there is a dedicated team available for such purposes. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For getting Salil Ankola to good article status. Keep up the good work! ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

A pleasant surprise! Didn't really expect this to happen very soon. Thanks you so much for reviewing the article, and congrats for getting British Asian cup to GA. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 12:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I wondered if you had a few minutes to look this nomination over and provide any feedback that you might have! Thanks in advance for any input :D Harrias ^talk 21:02, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll have a look for sure! —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I've got the Azhar list open on my browser as my next Wiki thing to do, but I've got a fair bit of work to do around the house, so I might not get to it for a day or two. Things are pretty busy for me in real-life at the moment, but I'll definitely get to it! Harrias ^talk 17:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Hey Vensatry, very congratulations to be the current month's face of "Featured Indian Wikimedian". Good luck! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot :) —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 13:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

You should be given Bharat Ratna for getting degrees in two topics. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 13:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

You may propose this to your local government Vaiibhav! Hope you understood what I meant ;) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 14:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

The police won't allow me to meet Shiela Dikshit, they will think that I am a AAP supporter. Jokes apart, Vensatry is really fantastic (especially when it comes to cricket lists). ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 14:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Bharat Ratna for getting two degrees? That being the case there would be too many awardees in our country :) —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 16:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nargis Anhonee 52.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Please try to review it. Thanks in advance! :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 09:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Sure, when I get time —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 13:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

A person who gets navigated to Baadshah (2013 film) surely knows the difference between Baadshah and Baasha! Most of the users pass through the dab page and they are pretty aware of what they want. I have removed the not to be confused. Had the article been named Baadshah, it would have made sense to place the link...but considering the title is horribly clear...I don't think so. Cheers TheStrikeΣagle 12:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I neither thought about Rajini nor SRK's film. We ought to be more clear in this case by placing a link at the top of every page. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 12:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Vensatry, List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Abdul Qadir is at FLC. Look forward to your comments there. Regards, Zia Khan 19:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

I am not feeling comfortable in closing this discussion as it is tough to decide whether the awards are notable or not. I believe that someone more familiar with Tamil film industry should close this one. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 14:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

You need not have any understanding on the topic; go with the consensus. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

I have closed the discussion, so please merge the articles. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 15:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

		Women's day award
		Thank you for all of the effort you put into the International Women's day edit-a-thon! I am presenting you with the Women's day award for participating in the edit-a-thon. Your contributions are highly appreciated!-- Netha (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Netha :) —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 13:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Although assessed as a good article, the damage done to the article can't be measured. Since u seem too busy to edit it, can I request for it to be delisted? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, BTW currently a peer review for the film Parasakthi is going on. If u r interested, pls join. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

You can very well take it to GAR. But make sure that you have valid reasons for it. I'll try to review Parasakthi when I get time. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Done it, I placed a request tag. Additionally, for Parasakthi, Sivaji was paid a monthly salary of ₹250. I know that is horribly less, but it would have meant a lot more then. I do not know how to adjust it for inflation. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:46, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Padmalakshmisx? — Abhishek  ^Talk 15:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Looks alike. Need some time before we come to a conclusion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 11:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Much better. Still has tag on the top. 2nd to last paragraph appears to have an uncited portion at the end of it. — Cirt (talk) 04:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Last sentence of last paragraph ends without a cite? — Cirt (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done Dunno which one is undergoing review . Can we have a look at reviewing the list now? —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

I am working on an accolade list article. Is awardsandshows.com a reliable source to use? Thanks mate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.246.92 (talk) 11:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Don't think it's reliable. The best place to ask this would be WP:RSN. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 19:10, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much.27.109.19.226 (talk) 05:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

I am working on the article List of Indian Academy Award winners and nominees. I want to promote it to Feature list status. This is the help I need.

1. 1 I am having this confusion. Some Indians; for eg:- Deepa Mehta who is an Indo-Canadian, whose film Water was nominated in the Best Foriegn Film category, from Canada. Should such nominations be included in this this?

My opinion (just mine) - I don't think such nominations should be included.

1. 2 Please look at the article. How is it overall? Do you think it fulfills FA criteria? Any suggestions?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surge elec (talk • contribs)

I really doubt whether it satisfies criteria 3(b) after having a look at the size of the list. However, I'm not an expert in this regard. Need fresh eyes to look into this. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 14:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Alright. Thank you again. Surge_Elec (talk) 09:20, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

--Bejnar (talk) 23:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, the list is at FLC. Any chance you could have a look at? Zia Khan 13:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

The peer review for Parasakthi is going on, and the article is shaping up well. If u would like to take part in the review, pls do so. I m not compelling u, but it would be very useful for a very neglected article. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I will when I get time. In the meanwhile, I suggest you to list down the reasons for Kamal's GAR, else no point in simply placing the tag. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 05:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Placed a GA reassessment tag with reason invisibly specified. Don't know how to actually specify one. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Invisibly specified? You should click the "follow this link" to create a sub page to list down your concerns and once you're done with it, save the page. Please go through WP:GA/R for a better idea and follow the instructions. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Kokila (film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 13:32, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

This page is where the reassessment for Kamal Haasan as a GA is going on. Pls take part for best results. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

This is where Thuppakki's peer review is going on, hope i didn't mess anything. do u want to take part? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

User:Benedictdilton uses this website as a source. The news items there are directly copied from reliable sources, and I don't know how to handle this. Could you give him a fitting reply here?-- Dravidian  Hero  19:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Being a newbie he may not be aware of what kind of sources fall into the RS category and our copyright policies. It seems that is not adamant and willing to learn. So I guess there shouldn't be any problem. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 05:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Actually I'm myself not sure whether southmonitor.com could pass the test as it copies from reliable sources. That's why asked you what to do.-- Dravidian  Hero  13:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Does not qualify WP:RS! —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

This website southmonitor.com took me to a lot of trouble. Since I had been notifed as a sock puppet I had gone through a detailed study of the said website for almost 3 hours. What I find out is that the said website is publishing artcles provided by Reuters, Indo-Asian News Service and Press Trust of India which are cerditable news agencies in India and mentioned as news agency in wikipedia. I was using that site because I am getting information from all these reputed news agencies at a single source and the website gives credit to the news provider agency as well. If we cross check we can see the same articles on almost all news portals. Actually I was planning to avoid this website from my future reference list. But the recent allegations aganist me is forcing me to get clarification on the issue.Benedictdilton (talk) 04:16, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	For your contributions to Indian film and intelligent comments on here. Keep up the great work! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you :) —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 12:05, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

It's great that somebody of your quality is improving pre 1990 films on the other Indian film industries, old Kannada, Telugu and Tamil films really need an incredible amount of basic work!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 13:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment! Those are really interesting, however finding sources would be a major challenge. In the case of Kokila, a landmark film which would be known hardly by a few people, I thought of expanding the article after reading a snippet from Daily Thanthi, a Tamil daily. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 16:05, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Answered your questions at Template:Did you know nominations/Bazy Tankersley. Thanks! Montanabw^(talk) 17:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Ping again. I think we are getting there. Montanabw^(talk) 00:00, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Ping. I added the other source for the 2800 number. Let's get this hook blessed, please, it's been taking longer than usual... Thanks. Montanabw^(talk) 17:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

I've already passed the nom. Cheers —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, and appreciate your review! Montanabw^(talk) 17:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Orlady (talk) 23:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 08:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article List of international cricket centuries by Steve Waugh know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on June 3, 2013. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/June 3, 2013. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. Thanks! Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Why don't you try for an FAC on the actress?--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Still a fair amount of work is needed for that isn't it? —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 03:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Honestly speaking, I have not read the article at all, so don't know about its condition. The advantage is it is short. The actress being new, coverage will be easier to obtain. It should be a much easier target.--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Will give a try! —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)