Hi User3810486! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User3810486! Your additions to Mesrop Mashtots have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This article does not currently meet the notability guidelines for standalone lists. Can you find any sources that discuss the subjects as a group?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ancient Armenian Manuscripts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User3810486! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Armenian translation of John Chrysostom's commentary on the Psalms. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User3810486,

Thank you for your contributions to articles on Armenian subjects. I hope you will continue to make them. I saw that you created an article for The Life of Mesrop Mashtots. Since Koriun has no other known works other than Life of Mashtots, it is probably an unnecessary content fork (creating a separate page about the same or almost the same topic, see WP:REDUNDANTFORK for more about this). I'd like to hear your opinion about this. I think it would be best to add any new information about the author and his one work to the article Koriun. Best wishes, Revolution Saga (talk) 01:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, information about the alphabets and the works in Armenian, Caucasian Albanian and Georgian are fragmentary, dispersed and unorganized and I want to help organize them. I only use serious references when I contribute. The articles will be expanded by me and others of course with passages from the actual works. If I do this not separately but in articles that already exist they will be overloaded with information. This information overload is a reason for others to delete very relevant information. Best wishes. User3810486 (talk) 21:12, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mesrop Mashtots shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Երևանցի ^talk 19:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This warning goes both ways. Academic references and quotations from distinguished historians should not just be erased for unknown reasons. This is detrimental to wikipedia and to the article. "Patriotism" shouldn't cloud the judgement for what is and isn't relevant to the article. User3810486 (talk) 10:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User3810486, thank you for your contributions to the article Christianization of Armenia. I see that you reverted a couple of my edits which had reverted some of your changes. As far as I can tell from the sources (for example, Thomson 2013) and the article for Osroene, the conversion of that kingdom to Christianity in the 3rd century AD is not universally accepted. For this reason, presenting it as fact in the lead doesn't seem appropriate, especially not without sources. It would probably be good to add an explanatory note stating that some scholars accept the account of Abgar's conversion while others don't etc. etc. Best, Revolution Saga (talk) 07:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @User3810486, following up on this. On another note, please strive to preserve the original citation style of the article if you make more additions (short citations + list of all sources at the bottom). There are some citeref errors now because of multiple citations with the same reference ID. Best wishes, Revolution Saga (talk) 21:32, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I try to find best sources and make it the article more verified. I disagree with your changing of the titles but I will add more details and maybe you will change your mind? Thank you for your help. User3810486 (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I wasn't referring to the quality of the sources, but to the citation style. Also you didn't address my original comment about the changes to the lead regarding Osroene. Best wishes, Revolution Saga (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't just be deleting links to Syriac Christianity in Christianization of Armenia article. No matter how you look at it Christianity arrived in Edessa earlier and the borrowings and adaptations are from Syrian into Armenian not the other way round. Syriac alphabet is also 4 centuries older than the Armenian alphabet, the process becomes logical. Whether Osrhoene was or was not the first Christian Kingdom is as disputed as whether Armenia was the same. I reworded it but you are still pushing only Armenia as the first Christian state. Tell me what other states claim being the "First Christian Kingdoms" besides Osrhoene and Armenia since you removed the mention of Osrhoene? User3810486 (talk) 08:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me what other states claim being the "First Christian Kingdoms" besides Osrhoene and Armenia since you removed the mention of Osrhoene? Iberia and the Kingdom of Axum also converted to Christianity in the 4th century AD. Also, if Garsoian's hypothesis that the Armenian Satrapies converted before the Arsacid kingdom is correct, they could also be considered the "first Christian kingdoms". This is mentioned in the article.

No matter how you look at it Christianity arrived in Edessa earlier and the borrowings and adaptations are from Syrian into Armenian not the other way round. There is no doubt that Christianity spread to Armenia from the south and that Syriac Christianity already existed at that point (as the article makes quite clear). The question is whether Osroene, as a kingdom or state (the sentence in the lead says "becoming one of the first states to do so") converted to Christianity before Armenia, and you haven't provided sources for that. The monarchy of Osroene had ceased to exist by 242 at the latest (per Iranica), and the conversion of Abgar the Great of Osroene to Christianity seems to be disputed (whereas Trdat's conversion is not disputed by anybody; only the date is in question). Revolution Saga (talk) 21:12, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for you help, but you shouldn't unlink Osroene. Others don't claim to be the first Christian kingdoms but Osroene and Armenian are in a disagreement over this. Osroene ceased to exist in 242 but Armenia many times throughout history as well ceased as a kingdom. Trdat's conversion is only confirmed by Armenian sources, are there any non Armenian history sources about Trdat's Christianization? User3810486 (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Until you've provided reliable sources which unequivocally state that the kingdom of Osroene converted to Christianity, it can't be in the article. When I removed it, it was unsourced. In any case, the article is about Armenia, not Osroene, so I'm not sure why we can't just let the article stand as it is; "one of the first states to do so" is still accurate, whether Armenia was precisely the first or only one of the first. Revolution Saga (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to The Book of Letters has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 08:39, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please check now if it is correct. User3810486 (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that's better. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:29, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Christianization of Armenia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. MCE89 (talk) 03:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User3810486. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ancient Armenian Manuscripts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User3810486,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Edward V. Gulbekian for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 21:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have postponed the speedy deletion of this article. But it does need work so to prevent deletion, I moved it to "draft status"; you can find it at Draft:Edward V. Gulbekian.

Please read over this page:

• Help:Your first article

and follow the material there to get your draft ready for review.

Thanks for contributing here! —A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 02:48, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think the article should exist because it has information not available anywhere. There is no list of works by this person who was cited by academicians frequently and he wrote many interesting articles that appear in academic journals. He was not just private person but an active person of Armenian historian circles. User3810486 (talk) 07:49, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User3810486. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Armenian translation of John Chrysostom's commentary on the Psalms, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User3810486. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ancient Armenian Manuscripts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User3810486. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Armenian translation of John Chrysostom's commentary on the Psalms".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alphabets of the South Caucasus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alphabets of the South Caucasus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 11:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Avedis Krikor Sanjian, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:58, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Avedis Krikor Sanjian. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 04:21, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User3810486. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edward V. Gulbekian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User3810486. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Edward V. Gulbekian".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 03:25, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]