The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was speedy keep as a bad faith nomination supported by a sock-puppet, with no other editors opining delete. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Uncle G 19:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable, no outside sources, no newspaper articles, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyington Duarm (talk • contribs) 2007-06-19 21:43:14

• Delete, does have afew newspaper mentions, but not as many as some deleted sites. Mynglestine 04:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep: This may be a bad faith nomination: from an account created only yesterday, nom's put up several articles for deletion. There may also be sockpuppetry at work; User:Mynglestine is likewise a near-SPA, and has strangely (and solely) chimed in on all nom's recent AfDs.  RGTraynor  18:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As the delete vote said, it has multiple newspaper mentions, which act as outside sources. If the lack of sources and of articles is the only reason to determine its non-notability, then there's no reason to support deletion. Nyttend 18:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.