The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 14:56, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Damarea Liao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E - the Kardashian thing. Fails WP:BIO. I am not persuaded that "National Youth Poet Laureate to Japan" confers notability. WP:NOTINHERITED from random relatives. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Women, Television, Nigeria, Japan, and South Carolina. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• There are still several articles and reliable sources that confirm that she is Notable. It's still of widely conversed public conversation and discussions through news sources. Blakebi (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2025 (UTC) — Blakebi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• The media itself confirms notability. The Kardashian feud is very talked about in the media. Malanakinsley (talk 16:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC) Confirmed sock of Blakebi. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This doesn't seem to be notable. All I see is IMdb, Instagram, and some other stuff. 208.56.148.137 (talk) 04:58, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  No, there are multiple international headlines in China and Japan. It doesn't look like she's as relevant to the U.S but more China. I think Google blocks those. 205.186.47.1 (talk) 13:09, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BLPDELETE - until the subject is substantially recognised as being a high-profile individual in their own right, we should not have an article about them. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 08:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.