User talk:Another Believer

Kobe the Italian Greyhound
(2010–2023)
Portland, Oregon, 2020; Seattle, 2022
Wikimedia Commons

Welcome to the 2026 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here, and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: She Done Already Done Brought It On has been accepted

She Done Already Done Brought It On, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nighfidelity (talk) 02:53, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Nighfidelity Thanks and Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Watching CNN's New Year's Eve celebration (let's face it, I'm not staying up to midnight), and I saw the plug for RuPaul's Drag Race and immediately thought of you and your drafts. Wishing you and your family a happy new year! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricane Wind and Fire 👍 Like Thanks and same to you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heavens to Betsey! has been accepted

Heavens to Betsey!, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gilgongo (talk) 12:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Gilgongo Thanks and Happy New Year! --Another Believer (Talk) 14:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gayest Ball Ever has been accepted

Gayest Ball Ever, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MelbourneIdentity (talk) 18:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and Happy New Year! --Another Believer (Talk) 18:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Werq the World (episode) has been accepted

Werq the World (episode), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 19:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@TheObsidianGriffon Thanks and Happy New Year! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Happy New Year! TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lip Sync LaLaPaRuza Smackdown – Reunited

I added that to the Season 16, but it is goofy. It is a redirect to 16, with a bunch of article below it. It should either be changed to just the redirect and removed from the template, or have the redirect removed and changed into a normal article. Giving the direct edit to avoid the problems with editing the redirect.Naraht (talk) 21:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Naraht (talk) 21:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Naraht Yes, this is because an editor has incorrectly redirected the page. See also: Talk:Lip_Sync_LaLaPaRuza_Smackdown_–_Reunited#redirect. You are welcome to revert the edit if you disagree, as I am not interested in edit warring. @Ad Orientem and Liz: FYI ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
See also this edit which I assume is why User:CactusWriter has deleted Rats: The Rusical for now (at least until User:Olliefant can weigh in). I don't understand why one editor is fighting so hard to have articles about Drag Race removed but I will continue to improve the drafts for AfC. Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah Rats wouldn't have been a valid csd given the page has been improved. I'd take it Requests for undeletion or deletion review Olliefant (she/her) 23:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@CactusWriter: Are you willing to restore or shall I go to Requests for undeletion? I've worked to restore ~40 articles about Drag Race episodes recently via AfC, so quite a few editors seem to disagree with one editor's assessment. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:45, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lip Sync LaLaPaRuza Smackdown – Reunited for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lip Sync LaLaPaRuza Smackdown – Reunited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lip Sync LaLaPaRuza Smackdown – Reunited until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--woodensuperman 21:59, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Glitter Ball (RuPaul's Drag Race episode) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glitter Ball (RuPaul's Drag Race episode), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glitter Ball (RuPaul's Drag Race episode) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question

You made the comment on Draft:WTF!: Wrestling's Trashiest Fighters: This submission is part of a larger effort to get articles about RuPaul's Drag Race episodes restored to the main space. This episode has received in-depth reviews by multiple independent and reliable sources (I've included a few in the table below) and the article is long enough to justify a fork from the season page. What is the history? In particular, were these episodes previously in article space, and when? Also, has there been discussion at the season article talk pages? Robert McClenon (talk) 17:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon There have been several discussions at various venues, including here on my user talk page above, but I think these would offer the most helpful context:
Yes, many articles were previously in the main space, but I moved them into the draft space voluntarily at the request of others for further development. I have been going through the process of expanding and resubmitting the drafts at AfC. Since November, all ~40 submitted drafts were accepted by uninvolved editors. I'll say little else and let you and others review the discussions and form your own conclusions. I hope these offer helpful context but let me know if you have other questions. Thanks and Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:39, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Followup Questions

Thank you for responding. I saw a discussion at WikiProject Television and tried to respond to it, and I think that at least one editor didn't understand what I was trying to say, and I think that I was incorrectly criticized. I had been looking for what was the consensus at the WikiProject about the RuPaul's Drag Race drafts, and I see that there isn't and won't be a consensus. Unless you ask me to wait, I am about to start accepting the episode drafts, and will let the community decide which of them they think pass episode notability. I was waiting for you to reply at WikiProject Television, but it appears that you are, probably wisely, avoiding involvement in that discussion. Should I go ahead and start accepting the drafts? Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: I do not think it is appropriate for me to have an opinion re: how the drafts should be reviewed, or who should review them. I've made it clear I am going to continue submitting drafts at AfC because I am confident there are many notable episodes, despite a couple other editors saying otherwise ad nauseam and as evidenced by the 40+ drafts accepted thus far. In my opinion, all of these episode entries could be improved to resemble "And the Rest Is Drag". I don't understand the determination to prevent this from happening. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
My opinion, as I have stated at WikiProject Television, is that the project is divided, so that there is no local consensus, and I would prefer to see the decision about notability made by the community rather than by the lack of a local consensus. As you can see, I have accepted 7 drafts. One is under review by another reviewer. I am not aware of any other episode drafts that are currently waiting for review. If you call my attention to any of them, I will review them. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:32, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You write: I don't understand the determination to prevent this from happening.. I think I understand it well enough to know what I am disagreeing with. First, I think that some editors don't like drag. They generally won't say so. Second, I can see that some editors think that we have too many low quality articles. I don't think that this category includes the drafts in question, but they may think so. Third, I think that some editors think that episode articles should be a rare exception. We can and do disagree, but I think that is why they are opposed. If they want to know what the community thinks , that is what a consensus process such as AFD is for. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:32, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon Thanks for being among the 20 editors who have accepted one or more Drag Race episode drafts. I am pleased to see so many entries restored and I am going to continue expanding and submitting drafts for review. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WTF!: Wrestling's Trashiest Fighters has been accepted

WTF!: Wrestling's Trashiest Fighters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:50, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lip Sync LaLaPaRuza Smackdown (RuPaul's Drag Race season 15) has been accepted

Lip Sync LaLaPaRuza Smackdown (RuPaul's Drag Race season 15), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:07, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RDR Live! (RuPaul's Drag Race season 17) has been accepted

RDR Live! (RuPaul's Drag Race season 17), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:33, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lip Sync Lalaparuza Smackdown (RuPaul's Drag Race season 17) has been accepted

Lip Sync Lalaparuza Smackdown (RuPaul's Drag Race season 17), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RuPaullywood or Bust has been accepted

RuPaullywood or Bust, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Social Media Kings Into Queens has been accepted

Social Media Kings Into Queens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Social Media: The Unverified Rusical has been accepted

Social Media: The Unverified Rusical, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrate Wikipedia's 25th anniversary in Portland!

GIF of the number 25

Hey Another Believer,

You're invited to the celebration of Wikipedia's 25th anniversary in Portland, Oregon! Join us at the Rose City Book Pub at 2:00 PM on Sunday, January 18.

Please RSVP at the link above, even if you might be interested, so we can let the Pub know how many people to expect. Hope to see you there!

(To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:59, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draggily Ever After has been accepted

Draggily Ever After, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 10:31, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Meena Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:24, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charisma, Uniqueness, Nerve & Talent Monologues has been accepted

Charisma, Uniqueness, Nerve & Talent Monologues, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 10:32, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Last Ball on Earth has been accepted

The Last Ball on Earth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Opening Number 1 has been accepted

Big Opening Number 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 10:33, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Villains Roast has been accepted

The Villains Roast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 10:35, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Day / 25th anniversary of Wikipedia, Saturday Jan 17

This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2026)

Happy New Year

Happy New Year old friend, so excited to see another year of statues and fabulousness from your writing desk, I remain as ever, No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@No Swan So Fine Thanks so much and Happy New Year to you as well! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:34, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@No Swan So Fine: By the way, Template:Public art in Milan and Template:Public art in Rome are my latest public art template creations, if you and/or User:Ham II are interested in helping to beautify/organize like Template:Public art in London (which is one of my favorite navboxes!). Either way, looking forward to more public art collaborations in 2026! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:40, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RuPaulmark Channel has been accepted

RuPaulmark Channel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bossy Rossy RuBoot has been accepted

Bossy Rossy RuBoot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 60s Girl Groups has been accepted

60s Girl Groups, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drag Baby Mamas has been accepted

Drag Baby Mamas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question for restaurant articles

Hello, fellow restaurant enthusiast! What information do you usually include in the description section of an article on a restaurant? I would love to hear your insight on how to give a good overview on a place's design and menu. —TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 07:19, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@TrademarkedTWOrantula Hi! Depending on what sourcing allows, I generally try to include a description of the restaurant's location, exterior and interior, and menu (including type(s) of cuisine and an overview of food and drink options, especially those featuring unique ingredients). Here are a few Good articles about restaurants that might be helpful examples:
I hope this helps! Thanks for your continued work on restaurant articles. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Telosa for deletion

"Country Queen" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Country Queen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 8 § Country Queen until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

"Phantom Pups" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Phantom Pups has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 8 § Phantom Pups until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:31, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"King of Stonks" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect King of Stonks has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 8 § King of Stonks until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"Mind Your Manners (TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mind Your Manners (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 8 § Mind Your Manners (TV series) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:40, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: You Can't Keep a Good Drag Queen Down! has been accepted

You Can't Keep a Good Drag Queen Down!, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 09:07, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:19, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frock the Vote! has been accepted

Frock the Vote!, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2026)

This Month in GLAM: December 2025

Proposed deletion of Campo San Stin

Resolved

Nomination of Campo San Stin for deletion

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rufus Wainwright articles by quality

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Rufus Wainwright articles

Do you still plan to write more in the Draft:Free America Walkout?

How about reviewing the article right now so that this article could be as soon as possible and when it becomes public people will edit it, meaning it would have more info than a unreviwed article ~2025-43053-85 (talk) 20:23, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've already said I do not recommend working on this in the main space ahead of the event. I know from experience that someone will just nominate it for deletion, even if the event is very likely to be notable from a Wikipedia perspective. My recommendation is to update the draft page between now and event. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:59, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
allikas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Whataworld06