Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been editing a lot of the articles on French Polynesian history recently. I made changes to your edits on Teriitaria II since it is a A-level article and need to follow correct formatting. The introduction is a summary of the content of the article and usually does not need sourcing. The sources should go in the main body of the article. The sources you added gives a more clear timeline of her deposition. Using the sources you provided, I added more details from them to the deposition section and just a short summary in the introduction section. Can I ask that you also add more details about the source instead of a bare link in the future? I also think it might be helpful to add details from the sources other than just using them to cite dates. KAVEBEAR (talk) 17:38, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello M. Kavebear,

Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia. It's not long since I expressed myself on this site. But that's no excuse for my clumsiness and laziness when it comes to writing. I must admit that the architecture of your article is of excellent quality. I'm still far from having reached such a level of excellence, but I'm learning every day and I'll try to draw inspiration from it. The update of your article on Teriitaria is proof of your open-mindedness and willingness to work together on Polynesian history. A lot has been said about them. There's a proliferation of myths that time has finally enshrined and that we're trying to combat. The contribution of relevant sources is sometimes decisive in the search for truth. This truth is often found in the writings of people who were present on site when the events took place.Thanks to you, Teriitaria's deposition is now set in stone for a very long time to come.

Respect Mr. Kavebear.

From the Duponnerie ship in the Internet sea. August 12th, 2023. Duponnerie (talk) 23:11, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duponnerie. Thank you for your work on U'uru. Another editor, Alalch E., has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

The article is quite impressive. I have marked it as reviewed. Wishing you a wonderful day ahead.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alalch E.}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Alalch E. 12:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tamatoa IV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Colonist. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Teriitaria I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borabora.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Wilson (missionary) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Wilson (missionary) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 10:47, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ProClasher97. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I’ve noticed your edits towards the deletion discussion you are currently involved in, as well as the edit summaries of recent edits such as here [1] and here. [2] Please keep in mind that these kinds of things are not acceptable at all, and I very highly recommend you refrain from making such comments, as you may end up getting blocked if you continue. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 07:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ProClasher97, don't waste your time writing such nonsense—contribute and post your sources to move things forward. Merry Christmas—it's April 1st! Duponnerie (talk) 08:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Duponnerie: The personal attacks that you keep adding in your edit summaries need to stop, as they are not civil and can be seen as harassment. If it’s in regards to a disagreement on the deletion discussion you have been involved in, you should propose reasons as to why the article should not be deleted in a constructive, civil way. Resorting to personal attacks (such as telling people to "take their pills" [3] [4]) is not acceptable at all, it’s not going to convince people of your side, and it is likely only going to result in you getting blocked. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 09:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again ProClasher97, I’m scared out of my mind. The wind is blowing strong today. The fools are out, they’re coming in squads! Duponnerie (talk) 10:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's policy against harassment.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  asilvering (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duponnerie,

Thank you for creating John Jefferson (missionary).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Subject of article is not significant; and has no 2ndary sources that talk about him. The major source for the article is "Wilson" which is a primary source (colleague of the subject). Probably should delete the article, and move any content into an article about missionaries in Tahiti; maybe French_Polynesia#Religion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duponnerie

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Noleander, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, John Jefferson (missionary), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Noleander}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duponnerie,

Thank you for creating Gregory Warner (missionary surgeon).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Subject of article is not significant; and has no 2ndary sources that talk about him. The major source for the article is "Davies" which is a primary source (and a colleague of the subject of the article). Probably should delete this article, and move any content into an article about missionaries in Tahiti; maybe French_Polynesia#Religion

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 15:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duponnerie

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Noleander, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Gregory Warner (missionary surgeon), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Noleander}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 15:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duponnerie,

Thank you for creating Henry Bicknell (missionary).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Subject of article is not significant; and has no 2ndary sources that talk about him. The major sources are all primary sources (colleagues of the subject). Probably should delete the article, and move any content into an article about missionaries in Tahiti; maybe French_Polynesia#Religion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duponnerie

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Noleander, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Henry Bicknell (missionary), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Noleander}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to George Platt (missionary). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to James Elder (missionary). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duponnerie. Thank you for your work on James Elder (missionary). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

An engaging biography for an early missionary to Australia, notable for his strong civic engagement early in the Sydney colony. The creator has run into some difficulties; the content here is fine.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:04, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duponnerie. Thank you for your work on George Platt (missionary). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Rather well-referenced from 19th and 20th century sources. Perhaps too many primary references for some, but I think that there are sufficient reliable source to warrant inclusion (despite the creator's difficulties).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]