Hello DepressedPer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! xC | ☎ 05:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply] 208.93.179.86 (talk) 00:39, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to 97th Academy Awards did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! City of Silver 03:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pirates Plundarrr Box Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you have decided to switch several of my Forestry GANs from "Agriculture, food and drink", which is the home of Forestry, to "Biology and medicine". This seems to me entirely unhelpful, but not terribly surprising in an encyclopedia where agriculture (let alone forestry) is despised, neglected, and presumably not understood. I'm actually trying for my sins to fix that. You may like to note that several of these species are of "low" importance when considered as species (Biology), but are "high" or "top" when considered as relevant to forestry (Agriculture). That would seem to me more than a good enough reason to revert all of them. Is there any good reason why we shouldn't immediately put these articles back again? I'm certainly minded to do so. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:45, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jada (2008 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DepressedPer, just a note that your edit comment "Reassessment." which I've seen twice now is enough to send the average GAN editor to A&E as it sounds like a terrible warning of a WP:GAR ... when all you're doing is helpfully tidying-up after a novice reviewer. Possibly "tidying up GA history" or words to that effect? Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:16, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]