Talk:Keijō nippō

GA review

Passed. Dracophyllum, (1 PR) 02:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Keijō nippō/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Seefooddiet (talk · contribs) 22:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Dracophyllum (talk · contribs) 23:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments to follow. Dracophyllum, (1 PR) 23:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1a) prose
    • it was considered by who?
    • references are not required in the lede, as long as they are included in the body somewhere
    • However, upon > After
    • hand off the > cede
    • link protectorate
    • Resident-General Itō played a significant role in the Keijō nippō's creation, and even reportedly proposed the name of the paper what does Keijō nippō mean?
    • which renamed to > which was renamed
    • what does this (小弱国) mean?
    • Tokutomi Sohō why is his entry 1910– ...?
  • 1b) MOS good
  • 2a) ref layout organised well
  • 2b) sources look like mostly books, journal articles or primary sources checkY
  • 2c) spotchecking clean checkY:
    • ref1 good
    • ref 15a good
    • ref 20 good
    • ref 38 good
  • 2d) earwig clean
  • 3a) covers key sections
  • 3b) good level of detail
  • 4) article is neutral in tone; (publication was certainly a propoganda instrument)
  • 5) stable as anything
  • 6a) images licensed well
  • 6b) pics also relevant
    Thank you for the review 🙂
    I implemented the suggestions. Several notes though:
    • Kept some refs in the lead for claims not made in body.
    • Deleted (小弱国); it was the orig Japanese-language text for "small and weak country" but think it's not needed
    • Tokutomi Sohō is only 1910 because I think in 1910 there were three different leaders of the paper, and Tokutomi only served a few months. I don't really know the exact dates each person served though; researching this would be very difficult. Even finding the years on the current article was hard enough.
    seefooddiet (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Awesome, super interesting article and very well written. Keep it up. Passing now. Cheers, Dracophyllum, (1 PR) 02:00, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by History6042 talk 18:26, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that just after the 1945 liberation of Korea, the remnants of the Japanese colonial government used armed guards to prevent Koreans from seizing the printing equipment of the newspaper Keijō nippō? Source: [1] 일본의 패전에 의해 한국은 해방을 맞이했지만 사회는 혼란스럽고 어수선한 상태에서 경성일보사의 조선인 종업원이 중심이 된 경성일보 사원대회가 열려 『경성일보』를 한국인이 접수하여 신문발행을 하자는 움직임이 일어났다. 그러나, 조선총독부의 정보과장이었던 아베 다츠가즈(阿部達一)는 이같은 경성일보내 조선인 종업원들의 움직임으로 인하여 사내가 혼란해지자 경성일보사 주변에 무장 일본군 100여명을 주둔시키고 총을 들이대며 경성일보 사원들을 위협하며 신문발행을 종용하였다. -> [In 1945], Korea was liberated due to Japan's defeat in the war. Amidst the societal chaos and upheaval, the Korean employees of the Keijō nippō held a conference. A movement formed amongst the Koreans to take control of the newspaper and its facilities. In response to the actions of the Koreans, Abe Tatsukazu, head of the Information Bureau of the Government-General of Chōsen, stationed around 100 armed Japanese soldiers around the newspaper's offices. The newspaper's employees were ordered at gunpoint to continue operations as they had before.
Improved to Good Article status by Seefooddiet (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.

seefooddiet (talk) 19:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Looks good, if a little long. Korean-language source accepted in good faith. Earwig is a clean <3%. Another great article for Korean history. ThaesOfereode (talk) 15:58, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Keij%C5%8D_nipp%C5%8D