Hello, Luizadnts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "History of the Cité Scolaire Robert-Badinter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads-up! I was having some issues with the draft, so it's better to start over again in the future. Luizadnts (talk) 14:58, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Monoceros R2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Perryprog (talk) 02:37, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Really awesome work on this translation by the way—I'll read it over again probably tomorrow but there's a good chance this can be upgraded to a B-class article. Thanks for your many contributions! Perryprog (talk) 02:57, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Luizadnts (talk) 14:58, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Camelopardalis dark region. Thanks! Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 05:46, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Luizadnts (talk) 15:20, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Maquis de l'Ain et du Haut-Jura when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out! I'll review those parameters as soon as possible and start using the "Show preview" button, which I wasn't until now, since I didn't know that was advised. Luizadnts (talk) 15:29, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Santissimo Nome di Maria e degli Angeli Custodi, Genoa when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:06, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for pointing that out! I'll check that as soon as possible, as well as other articles with this same error. Luizadnts (talk) 15:30, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like your use of {{sfn}} here is not as you'd expect. Please investigate and correct the referencing issue. I know that this template can not go inside a ref tag, nor does it take an id= parameter. You will likely need to switch to using {{efn}} instead. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:27, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out! I'll review that as soon as possible and will be more careful with this in the future. Luizadnts (talk) 15:34, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luizadnts. Thank you for your work on Carnot family. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi I reviewed your excellent wee article. It still needs a wee bit of work. The last image and could probably be moved up somehow to give the reference the correct spacing. Also the Detailed Genealogy section doesn't seem to be completed. There is a mistake in the template which is stopping it displaying. Could you fix that or perhaps remove it to talk until it can be fixed?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 08:03, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: Thank you for your review! I've moved the last image. As for the Detailed Genealogy section, I've tried to fix it but wasn't able to, so I just removed it for now, since I didn't find it terribly important to this article. Luizadnts (talk) 22:58, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am set to approve the above article. I've made quite a few changes, some to the wording and language templates, but mainly to add another source (Pacini). Under English wiki we can't rely on primary or tertiary sources, which just left one secondary source (Sahlins). This was frustrating since I could see the subject is notable, but as gatekeeper it needs multiple secondary sources. Fortunately I found a nice book review by a respected academic, which gave a second source - so making it "multiple" as per GNG. It had a disambig link to a wine brand, so I'm just waiting for that to be removed, that may take another day or so. ChrysGalley (talk) 21:02, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your help with the source! I'll look for more sources as well. Luizadnts (talk) 15:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Camelopardalis dark region, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw another reviewer comment that the article could benefit from sources, but between you and me, this is worlds better than >95% of the drafts I've reviewed in the past month. We're not looking for a featured article right out of the gate, though adding more sources certainly wouldn't hurt. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for saying that! I'll look for more sources anyway and will add them as soon as possible. Luizadnts (talk) 15:41, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Publihebdos. Thanks! MCE89 (talk) 07:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review! I'll fix the referencing errors and then look for more reliable sources. Luizadnts (talk) 15:45, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfred Siegfried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 13:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 13:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your support! Luizadnts (talk) 15:45, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

16 May 1877 crisis

added links pointing to Frontispiece, Wheel of Fortune, Rothschild Bank, Treaty of Frankfurt, Moral order, Second Empire, Vatican and Charles X

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to this article introduced multiple Harv/Sfn cite errors, 16 Harv warnings & 22 Harv/Sfn errors. This is probably because "Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at fr:Crise du 16 mai 1877" and you seem to have brought over the Sfn cites without their corresponding full citation reference, such as cite web, cite book etc. Therefore, the article is in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. In order to make it easy to spot these errors, you maybe should consider installing User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors.js on your common.js page. For installation & instructions go to User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors. I have fixed some of the issues, but since you are familiar with both the English Wikipedia and the French Wikipedia articles, it would probably be easier for you to do many of the fixes. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 02:45, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with that! I'll fix the errors as soon as possible. Also thanks a lot for the tip about installing HarvErrors.js, I didn't know that tool! Luizadnts (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Venerocolo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Le Monde when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:09, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and help! I've fixed some Harv errors in the Bibliography section too. Luizadnts (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Oldofredi when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:28, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Otto, Count of Louvain when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:26, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your reviews on my contributions! I'll be sure to review those parameters in all articles you've commented on as soon as I'm unblocked, and as I've said in a previous reply, I'll be sure to start using "Show preview"; I wasn't aware of the importance of using it. Luizadnts (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing is becomming disruptive due to your failure to heed the multiple warnings that have been given. Please understand that one of the requirements for editing on Wikipedia is communicating with fellow editors. While you are not required to respond to every comment on your talk page, failure to respond to any of the multiple warnings, or to heed the advice that has been given, indicates an intentional failure to communicate. Please respond to this message and acknowledge that you understand that communication is required. Additionally please ensure that you have read the multiple warnings that have been given to you on your talk page. Failure to communicate may result in you being blocked from editing. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:27, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to respond? Ever? Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:28, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zackmann, thank you for your messages and for pointing out my errors. I will do my best to re-check my previous articles and be more mindful of this point from now on. I'm deeply sorry for not responding to your messages previously, I wasn't checking my messages as I should. I'll also be more mindful of this from now on. Luizadnts (talk) 14:53, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Asafoetida, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please don't change the variety of English in an article without discussion per MOS:RETAIN. Iseult ^Δx talk to me 21:45, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out! I'll re-read the Manual of Style and review this article as soon as possible. Luizadnts (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've reverted Asafoetida to the last version before your revert and re-wrote the article to better fit into Wikipedia's style. If there's anything that could be done differently, please let me know. Luizadnts (talk) 23:38, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "History of the Charente-Maritime department".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:48, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me! I was having some trouble with this draft, so it's better to have it deleted and start over again. Luizadnts (talk) 15:54, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cedilla

added links pointing to Elzevir, Grammarian, Gothic script, Stigma, Palatalization and Occurrence

Grizzly Bear (dance)

added a link pointing to Manzano

Oro alla Patria

added a link pointing to Queen

San Martino, Este

added a link pointing to Presbytery

San Michele a Castiglione

added a link pointing to Presbytery

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Htanaungg was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Referencing errors should be fixed first.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Publihebdos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Htanaungg (talk) 10:00, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All done! Thank you for your review. Luizadnts (talk) 03:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Asafoetida

added links pointing to Antiquity, Artemisia, Dolomite and Benzoin

Oro alla Patria

added a link pointing to Queen

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luizadnts, I've regrettably felt the need to revert your translation of Siege of Hamburg. In making the translation you have lost the page number information on almost all of the very many references in the article. This makes it impossible for readers to verify the content, so in my opinion it fails WP:V. You should be able to fix this by undoing my revert and adding page numbers to each book citation, either by using the {{rp}} template or shortened footnotes from the {{harv}}/{{sfn}} family of templates.

While this is the first of your translations that I've seen the need to revert, I've noticed issues with a number of other articles that you've worked on:

• You very often link to disambiguation pages, which outside hatnotes and "See also" sections, is almost never helpful
• Your articles often contain Harv and Sfn multiple-target errors and / or Harv and Sfn no-target errors
• You frequently place references before punctuation, contrary to the advice in MOS:REFPUNCT.
• You often add unsupported parameters to infoboxes; see the notes left by Zackmann08 above.

None of these issues in isolation are terribly problematic, but because of the quantity of work that you do they leave a lot of cleanup to be done by other editors, which could be relatively easily avoided when you make the translations in the first place. In addition you have not replied to a number of messages left on your talk page, which makes it difficult to be confident that you are listening to feedback. Nobody's editing here is expected to be perfect, but it is expected that editors communicate and work with others to improve the encyclopedia.

The translation work that you are doing is very valuable to Wikipedia, and I would very much like to see it continue. It would be a pity to lose any more of it to these rather minor issues. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 13:48, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for telling me that! I'll review those issues in the Siege of Hamburg page and also in my other contributions. I haven't been checking my messages as I should, that's why I wasn't aware of these mistakes. Also, thanks for being gentle and didactical! I'm doing my best to learn; there are a lot of Wikipedia guidelines I wasn't aware of and I'm pretty new to editing Wikipedia. I'll keep your comment in mind to do better from now on. Luizadnts (talk) 16:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Best wishes for your editing going forward. If you find problems with {{sfn}} references that you can't fix feel free to drop me a note. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 08:23, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the offer, I'll definitely take you up on it if needed! Luizadnts (talk) 09:31, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update on the Siege of Hamburg page: I've fixed the citations using the Sfn template, I believe they're good to go now. But if there's anything that needs change, please let me know! Luizadnts (talk) 22:52, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you! That looks good to me! Best, Wham2001 (talk) 06:42, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:20, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for failure to communicate and disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  voorts (talk/contributions) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Luizadnts, please comment at the noticeboard section: link. It looks to me as if you are simply using a translation tool or script from Intertranswiki/OKA, but people have pointed out to you that your edits are causing errors in the infobox (because there are different parameters on different Wikipedias), and you are expected to respond to people raising problems with you. You are not completely blocked; you can still edit here and at the noticeboard, for example; but you have been blocked from editing articles until you respond and we can sort this out. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:03, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you so much for talking to me about that. I've read all comments in the noticeboard and commented there as well, and I took some time to read my Talk page and reply to everything I've neglected. I'm unable to fix my mistakes in articles while I'm blocked, but I'm eager to fix everything as soon as I can. I wasn't aware of the importance of replying to messages and comments, so I've neglected to check mine. I want to make sure everyone knows I'm willing to learn from my mistakes, which were honest. I'll do my best to read more about Wikipedia guidelines and review my contributions more carefully from now on. Also, the work we do at OKA has the same goal as Wikipedia itself, which is making knowledge more widely available for everyone. We all want to comply with Wikipedia guidelines and keep helping making Wikipedia a better place! Luizadnts (talk) 16:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luizadnts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wasn't checking my messages in my Talk page because I wasn't aware of the importance of checking them, being relatively new to Wikipedia editing. Now I understand better the importance of communication and am eager to keep contributing to Wikipedia while following our guidelines. Luizadnts (talk) 17:20, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your disruptive editing. Yamla (talk) 17:55, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luizadnts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My previous unblocking request was declined due to it not addressing my editing mistakes. I'd like to make clear that, besides now knowing the importance of communication among editors, now I am also aware I was making mistakes in editing and formatting, which I didn't know before. I'm taking the time to review what I edited wrong, and am eager to fix these editing errors as soon as I am unblocked. To make things completely clear, I am a relatively new editor and I'm learning more about editing guidelines everyday, but there are also some guidelines I still don't understand completely. From now on, I want to do my best to learn more, and ask for help from other editors when needed. Luizadnts (talk) 20:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing this request - you've already been unblocked. asilvering (talk) 07:44, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GTrang was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Most sources are impossible to verify because no external link has been provided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Officiality and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GTrang (talk) 23:52, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Found some academic articles and books to replace the unreliable sources, hope it's better now! Luizadnts (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josedimaria was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfred Siegfried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jô^hola 07:43, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Officiality, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GTrang (talk) 03:03, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Siegfried, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Publihebdos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GTrang (talk) 21:56, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Lova, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lakes of Revine Lago, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lago di Montorfano, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Lamar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Asafoetida, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:51, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Asafoetida

added links pointing to Esotericism, Pepper, Illumination, Qalat, Macedonian army, Benzoin and Ferula erubescens

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sasso di Simone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lake Venerocolo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:36, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Causes of the Third Crusade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Montorfano (mountain), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Asafoetida, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Biblioteca della Società Storica Subalpina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:10, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Latium Volcano, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Lamar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 12:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lakes of Revine Lago, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScalarFactor (talk) 00:29, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, nice work on the translation. Just a quick recommendation/request - if at all possible, when citing PDFs (especially ones that both aren't OCR'd and aren't in English), it'd be nice if you could use a template like {{rp}} (reference page) to provide page numbers. I can read a little bit of Italian, which helped me skim for the facts, but I think it'll improve the odds of a fast review in the future.

I'd also like to recommend nominating this article at WP:DYK. I think a hook related to the bronze sword from the history section would do pretty well, and you could potentially nominate one of the lake images too. ScalarFactor (talk) 00:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Lakes of Revine Lago, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. This page is FULL of errors in the Infobox. Please return and fix them ASAP. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Zackmann08, this article was translated from itwiki and I accepted it at AfC. I'm not entirely familiar with the specifics of {{infobox body of water}} myself so I've removed the parameters that weren't obviously equivalent on the itwiki article. ScalarFactor (talk) 00:45, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@ScalarFactor: that is all well and good. However a preview of the page reviews no less than a dozen errors that a basic use of WP:PREVIEW would have reviewed. I don't put that on you as you just accepted the article... But the creator should know to use preview. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:47, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for calling my attention to this and to @ScalarFactor for helping! I will have those errors reviewed by Monday and will update as soon as I fix them. Luizadnts (talk) 00:50, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm UtherSRG. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Pyrenean desman in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. UtherSRG (talk) 15:16, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Latium Volcano".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 04:24, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luizadnts. Thank you for your work on Lake Lamar. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for bringing this translation from Italian for a popular destination in Italy.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: It was a pleasure to work on this translation! If you know of any other pages that need translation, please let me know. Luizadnts (talk) 08:02, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Luizadnts,

Thank you for translating in english my article about foreign relations of Iraq. You are doing my work proud and I appreciate that. If I may make a suggestion, I wrote a similarly comprehensive article about Sudan.

Looking forward to exchanging ideas.

Best regards.

Terre Intègre (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really glad you liked my work! I'll be sure to work on your article about Sudan, which I've read and liked immensely. Keep up the good work, I can see your articles are very deeply researched and that's amazing. Luizadnts (talk) 08:04, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:France's arms exportation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Urban development in Lille, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You’ve made a great start in the article. It’s always frustrating when doing articles on geographic objects, but notability still needs to be satisfied, and as yet it lacks sufficient sources which prove notability. It requires 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, which talk at length about the topic of the article. Unfortunately the sources you have so far aren’t quite there. We need something which talks more directly and at length about the lake - whether that is more description about the size / location etc, or whether that’s about the construction history of the dams it feeds, either would be fine, but the articles you have so far aren’t quite passing mentions at best. I would love to see this article approved, so hopefully you can track down those sources soon, and we can take another look. Good luck and keep up the hard work 👍 .

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lake Venerocolo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As with the last reviewer, it is very likely that this article will eventually pass notability, but it isn’t there yet. Notability requires 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, which talk at length about the topic of the article. Unfortunately the sources you have so far aren’t quite there. Find another couple of sources, talking about the lake itself, and we should be able to revisit this again quickly. Good luck and keep up the good work 👍

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lake Lova and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:32, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Saint Luce, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizadnts. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Slag (metallurgy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You created the social housing in France article. Did you just translate that, or do you know the difference between Public housing in France and Social housing in France? I cant really make heads or tails of the difference. I can read French, but its a bit dense for me. I tried searching on Google the French names without much luck. ← Metallurgist (talk) 01:33, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]