Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of pro-Russian political parties on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 23:37, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Operation Cedar Falls on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 15:30, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Beabadoobee on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 03:30, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

لا تضيع وقتك بهذا الموقع. صدقنا. ~2026-11785-08 (talk) 04:32, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2026-11785-08 هل اعرفك؟ 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 07:54, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore them, Abo. It's probably just a troll. Some people don't have anything better to do. ThatTrainGuy1945 (talk) 03:36, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah probably, wasn't planning on listening to them anyway lol 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 07:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you speak Arabic why not edit it a lot? ~2026-13238-71 (talk) 01:36, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

that place is sadly a shithole 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 05:57, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for the notification. I am a new editor and I'm still learning the Wikipedia policies. I didn't realize there was already an existing article on this topic. I appreciate you pointing this out and taking the necessary steps to fix the duplication. I'll be more careful with my future contributions. Best regards! Night365 (talk) 05:06, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Night365 it's all good, we all make mistakes. Welcome to Wikipedia and happy editing! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 08:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

𐩫𐩰𐩫 𐩺𐩣𐩬𐩬 𐩨𐩬 𐩤𐩢𐩷𐩬 ~2026-13659-98 (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

وعليكم السلام @~2026-13659-98 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 07:15, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

𐩫𐩰𐩫 𐩱𐩬𐩪 𐩣𐩬 𐩨𐩬𐩥 𐩺𐩣𐩬𐩣 ~2026-13709-40 (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2026-13709-40 الترجمة طلعت معاي "كفك انس من بنو يمنم" . تكلم عربي يالطيب 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 08:15, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

معناته "كيفك يا انس(ان) من بنو يمن"

اللغة السبئية شوي غير عن اللغة العربية، عباله كنت بتفهم🙏😔 بس جذي الناس يحطون حروف مسند حق اشكال؟ ~2026-13709-40 (talk) 09:23, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

عبالي* ~2026-13709-40 (talk) 09:26, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

اها هههههههههههههه
لا والله ما حاولت اتعلمها، بس ايوه يعملوها بمترجم لانه اغلب الناس ما تفهم اللغة هذي @~2026-13709-40 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:45, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

يا مركب حمير، ما تعرف شلون لازم تصحح الناس وهم يكتبون اسمائهم غلط، والله العظيم مب شكل🙏😔 ~2026-13709-40 (talk) 11:05, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2026-13709-40 من تقصد؟ 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:07, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

في وايد ناس يحطون حروف مسند في اسمائهم بس يكتوب بشكل غلط ولازم اصححلهم، اسمك معروف "مكرب" وهاي لقب بس الناس يحطون اسماء مب القاب ~2026-13709-40 (talk) 11:27, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2026-13709-40 والله انا عن نفسي اشوف انه ترند المسند لازم يتتهي، اساسا الي عمله هم اصحاب جماعة الأقيال المتطرفين، وما فيه طريقة لتصحيح الأخطاء ذي غير انه نعيد إحياء اللغة السبئية زي ما حصل للغة العبرية (انا ضد هذي كمان) 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:56, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

😒 ~2026-13709-40 (talk) 12:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't call people, "donkey-riding fool"s. See WIKIPEDIA:PA. That's all, fascinating conversation anyways. (About the revival of the Sabaean language, it probably doesn't help that the language isn't even used in religious contexts like Hebrew was prior to the 19th century). 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 ^{Peep peep!} 03:31, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@ThatTrainGuy1945 the translator you used had messed up the translation lol. The correct translation would be “Federator (Mukarrib) of Himyar”. The word for the donkey in Arabic is Himar حمار and the plural form of it Hameer حَمير is spelled using the same letters Himyar حِميّر is spelled 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 03:56, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then, carry on. I apologize for my bad translator. You are (obviously) not a donkey riding fool. 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 ^{Peep peep!} 03:58, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Serves him right for opposing language revitalization! PA states an exception for this Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 03:58, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Second Cold War on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 08:30, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page is not allowed to sit in redlinked categories, per WP:USERNOCAT. Either create the oud categories immediately or take the code out, because pages are not allowed to sit in categories that don't exist to have pages sitting in them. Bearcat (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know how long this qausi-state lasted? I am wondering if it can be added to the list of short lived states. JaxsonR (talk) 22:50, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@JaxsonR I do not know the exact dates (which is why i did not add it to the article) but I’ve read somewhere that the areas existed for 10 years but I have to look for where I’ve found that first 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 10:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abo Yemen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Geneva Agreement".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]