The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as copyvio --Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 19:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus seems to be that schools under high school age are not inherantly notable. Only actual claims at notability seem to fall under the history of the area rather than the school itself. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 10:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Eh, sorry, seems like the whole page is a copyvio anyway, didn't catch it right away cause it's from a couple different pages. Marked for speedy now. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 10:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment — A {{copyvio}} template would have been preferable, as there is a whole process set up to handle such cases. Thanks. :-) — RJH (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.