Talk:Kiwi Farms: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 14: Line 14:


That first paragraph in the article is so biased that it’s almost insulting to my intelligence. Instead of making a fake news hit piece about this site, how about actually doing research and find out what it is actually about? I’m actually offended by that. [[Special:Contributions/50.107.100.99|50.107.100.99]] ([[User talk:50.107.100.99|talk]]) 17:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
That first paragraph in the article is so biased that it’s almost insulting to my intelligence. Instead of making a fake news hit piece about this site, how about actually doing research and find out what it is actually about? I’m actually offended by that. [[Special:Contributions/50.107.100.99|50.107.100.99]] ([[User talk:50.107.100.99|talk]]) 17:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

== From Humble Beginnings. ==

I feel like it should be stated that the group that followed Chris-Chan around after his/her discovery soon started the CWCki to document his life. Then the CWCki made the CWCki Forums to talk about Chris and his/her antics, which later turned into Kiwi Farms in 2015 so it could focus on other LOLcows besides Chris.

Also I like how this is the only time Wikipedia will acknowledge Chris-Chan, after the various times people tried to make an article on him/her (and after when Chris set up shop here).

[[User:Superspongebobbros|I am Proto, your security is my motto.]] ([[User talk:Superspongebobbros|talk]]) 02:57, 26 August 2019 (UTC)


== Delisted from multiple major search engines? ==
== Delisted from multiple major search engines? ==

Revision as of 18:43, 26 October 2019

WikiProject iconWebsites: Computing Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
WikiProject iconInternet culture Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

{{Controversial}} should not be used on pages subject to the contentious topic procedure. Please remove this template. Template:Not a forum

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 August 2019

It looks like it may be offline because their data center is blocking cloudflare CaptainLeslieHero (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Maranello10 (talk) 20:46, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First paragraph

That first paragraph in the article is so biased that it’s almost insulting to my intelligence. Instead of making a fake news hit piece about this site, how about actually doing research and find out what it is actually about? I’m actually offended by that. 50.107.100.99 (talk) 17:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted from multiple major search engines?

Word on the site, confirmed by many users, is that the website was just delisted by a number of internet search portals including DuckDuckGo, Bing, and others.

The forum is associated with 8chan and Encyclopedia Dramatica, both of have gone offline in the last weeks , so speculation is that Kiwi Farms is also in the process of being purged from the mainstream WWW. As they say, nothing of value was lost, but I thought it might be helpful to point this out here.

Can't find any good mainstream sources reporting on this yet, but the front page of Kiwi Farms has a sticky notification. There is also a thread dedicated to the deindexing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1002:B10D:4177:251B:28D4:E868:DEE9 (talk) 21:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How is a Know Your Meme image a reliable source?

this is the first source in the article as well. the implication is that know your meme should be taken seriously as a legitimate source then?-2601:546:8101:8E80:48C:A529:CE7F:FCED (talk) 17:12, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 October 2019

Basically, I just want to add more info to the page, and maybe, just maybe, put some more info in the infobox. Slavicanimefan2005 (talk) 11:47, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 13:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]