User talk:Nunh-huh: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
(-) old convos |
Griffin |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Nunh-huh/sandbox]] |
[[User:Nunh-huh/sandbox]] |
||
==Cyrus Griffin== |
|||
You're being far too dogmatic about the silly template. Putting "position abolished" in large bold letters, with Washington's name and title in small letters below it, meets with precedent (see [[George Washington]]), is a handy compromise in this very silly conflict, and accurately reflects the realities: the position was abolished, but it was also replaced. The new title certainly didn't have the same responsibilities, but the position of POTUS did in a sense replece the position of POTUSICA. Besides, what happened to consensus building and discussion? Reversion is seldom a good action. [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] ([[User talk:Fishal|talk]]) 02:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:02, 2 July 2008
Cyrus Griffin
You're being far too dogmatic about the silly template. Putting "position abolished" in large bold letters, with Washington's name and title in small letters below it, meets with precedent (see George Washington), is a handy compromise in this very silly conflict, and accurately reflects the realities: the position was abolished, but it was also replaced. The new title certainly didn't have the same responsibilities, but the position of POTUS did in a sense replece the position of POTUSICA. Besides, what happened to consensus building and discussion? Reversion is seldom a good action. Fishal (talk) 02:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)