Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

Hi Aksi_great, I am Gaurang Jadia from Rajkot. I have just completed BEIT from SVIT, Vasad. I was exploring Portal:Gujarat and redirected to your talk page. As you asked on portal, I like to work under WikiProject Gujarat. I am new and just started editing. But If you guide then we can work as team and can compose very good articles. Gaurang | Talk 07:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And a Happy New Year to you.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 19:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 12:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a test of your sleuthing skills, which I hope are as sharp as ever.  :) Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Loyolaemblem.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed Satellite Instructional Television Experiment on hold, the notes are on the talkpage. Thanks, and good luck! FamicomJL (talk) 19:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you kindly add Hindi (Devanagari) for the name of Pandit Pran Nath, at the Pandit Pran Nath article? Also, at Karonda? Also, Drut? Badagnani (talk) 07:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a debate is going on in the talk page of the article regarding inclusion of an image of a beggar in Bodhgaya. User Nikkul in defence of his argument is continuously making personal attacks against me, giving examples from other articles. This user is making wild accusations on me. I will request you please read the relevant sections on this page to give an inside in this user and to understand who is incivil. Please read the texts like these [1], [2], [3]. The Bodggaya beggar image is more appropriate than others because:

• You may know, many beggars live a condition like this, many of them have various disabilities.

There is no "typical" definition of poverty, or beggar. There are abled beggar, disabled beggar. The purpose of the article is depicting poverty. The other beggar images which this user want to place deleting the Bodhgaya beggar image are not good quality, one is B&W, and the other depicting a beggar girl in Ladakh. But my objection here is that Ladakh is quite different from rest of the country because of its geographics. Majority Indians live in plain. And this Bodhgaya beggar image is showing poverty at its most extreme level. It is not right to conceal the situation of poor men like this, it is the truth, the reality. This image touches the heart of the reader, which is a real situation. Yes not all beggars are disabled, but is this an argument? On the other hand it also can be said that not all beggars are abled. Our job here is not to understand who is abled, or who is not. But to find a good image which is representative of many.

• This user is repeatating his arguments and has taken a densive position by his ad hominem attack on me. This user has informed many partisan editors, like User:Hkelkar socks about the image. Any one do not agree with him, here I am trying to depict poverty, and he is labelling me as Indophobic. The only reason given against this image that "since all beggars have not messed up legs, this image is undue". But it is an anti-individualistic argument. So what if not all beggars do not have messed up legs? The fact is that such secenes is a reality and it would not be right to conceal it. Such scenes exists, it is the truth. If it is reality, if such scenes exits, then an article depicting poverty i.e. "the condition of lacking full economic access to fundamental human needs such as food, shelter and safe drinking water", only those images should remain which clearly illustrate this fact.
• Please remember the article is not about India, but the article is about poverty. This article is not depicting India, depicting poverty in India. So such image is not deriding India, it is illustrating the poverty in India. Such scenes does exists. Will it be right to conceal it? I am sympathetic to the poor. It is true their are abled beggars also, but such scenes does also exists. There are other images in the article which depict abled poor. This image will cover all the sides and will be very appropriate. I request you please look into the matter. Your right judgement will be appreciated. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aksi_great, I am Gaurang Jadia. You have created one article on personalities who won Padma Awards and Bharat Ratna of Ahmedabad. I like to ask you that from where you got such list, there is no any reference in article. I want to create a article which list Padma Awardee personalities from Rajkot. Can you help me to find? Gaurang | Talk 06:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aksi: You were an involved admin wrt User:Wiki Raja. A discussion thread on WP:ANI has been started, and please feel free to provide your inputs for the discussion. Thank you, - KNM ^Talk 17:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• FROM YOUR FRIEND:

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Birthday	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing Aksi great a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!--~~~~

--Nadir D Steinmetz 00:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday! Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]