Talk:His Majesty's Naval Service: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
definition |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== definition == |
== definition == |
||
According to the MOD's official defence statistics glossary (link on article page) and BR 8373 [Naval] Officers' Career Regulations, the naval servcice consists of RN and RM. The other services are not even military so are really unlikely to be included in a military service. In addition, an MOD glossary exists specifically to define such terms. This is also the definition on the template. There is only one (supposed) source for the |
According to the MOD's official defence statistics glossary (link on article page) and BR 8373 [Naval] Officers' Career Regulations, the naval servcice consists of RN and RM. The other services are not even military so are really unlikely to be included in a military service. In addition, an MOD glossary exists specifically to define such terms. This is also the definition on the template. There is only one (supposed, improperly cited) source for the alternative defintion of a military-and-civilian Naval Service, which is an inadequate counter-argument. [[User:Mesoso2|Mesoso2]] 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 20:45, 21 August 2007
The civilian support services are not part of the Naval Service as such:
- The Naval Service comprises the Royal Navy, Royal Marines, QARNNS and Reserve Forces. — BR 8373 [Naval] Officers' Career Regulations.
Franey 16:15, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- The glossary in BR1806 appears more detailed, and to me more trustworthy. Andrew Yong 22:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
definition
According to the MOD's official defence statistics glossary (link on article page) and BR 8373 [Naval] Officers' Career Regulations, the naval servcice consists of RN and RM. The other services are not even military so are really unlikely to be included in a military service. In addition, an MOD glossary exists specifically to define such terms. This is also the definition on the template. There is only one (supposed, improperly cited) source for the alternative defintion of a military-and-civilian Naval Service, which is an inadequate counter-argument. Mesoso2 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)