Talk:List of Pixar films: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Fanowaty (talk | contribs)
credits: Reply
Tag: Reply
Indagate (talk | contribs)
credits: Reply
Tag: Reply
Line 23: Line 23:
:This is ridiculous. It's obvious who we mean as their first mention is always by full name. There is no need to further expand the table and make it even larger and less clear when reading. [[User:Fanowaty|Fanowaty]] ([[User talk:Fanowaty|talk]]) 16:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
:This is ridiculous. It's obvious who we mean as their first mention is always by full name. There is no need to further expand the table and make it even larger and less clear when reading. [[User:Fanowaty|Fanowaty]] ([[User talk:Fanowaty|talk]]) 16:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
:Since this issue was not discussed properly by other editors, I am reverting the table to how it looked before your changes. Any major edits (like yours) need to be properly discussed with other editors, which wasn't the case. [[User:Fanowaty|Fanowaty]] ([[User talk:Fanowaty|talk]]) 16:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
:Since this issue was not discussed properly by other editors, I am reverting the table to how it looked before your changes. Any major edits (like yours) need to be properly discussed with other editors, which wasn't the case. [[User:Fanowaty|Fanowaty]] ([[User talk:Fanowaty|talk]]) 16:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
::Reverted your huge series of edits, you reverted so many edits it's hard to tell what's from when etc but doesn't seem recent. Not all effected the filmography table you mentioned. Please use edit summaries or explain more here so it's clear. For example, you removed 71 references, and not said why, that's seem like a big [[WP:Verifiability]] issue. You removed scope="row"'s and caption which are [[MOS:ACCESS]] issues. Bold edits do not {{tq|need to be properly discussed with other editors}} before making them per [[WP:BOLD]].
::Regarding the specific point raised here, I don't edit things like that usually but I'd say that seems correct as each cell in a table should be able to be read independently, i.e. people should be able to read the writer column without having read the directors column first. Consistent with featured list [[List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films]]. [[User:Indagate|Indagate]] ([[User talk:Indagate|talk]]) 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:01, 16 October 2022

credits

I feel a little uncomfortable of the people having their last names credit even though we already knew who made the films. but i don't feel like having their first names out even if it's a little confusing. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 04:15, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. It's obvious who we mean as their first mention is always by full name. There is no need to further expand the table and make it even larger and less clear when reading. Fanowaty (talk) 16:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Since this issue was not discussed properly by other editors, I am reverting the table to how it looked before your changes. Any major edits (like yours) need to be properly discussed with other editors, which wasn't the case. Fanowaty (talk) 16:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted your huge series of edits, you reverted so many edits it's hard to tell what's from when etc but doesn't seem recent. Not all effected the filmography table you mentioned. Please use edit summaries or explain more here so it's clear. For example, you removed 71 references, and not said why, that's seem like a big WP:Verifiability issue. You removed scope="row"'s and caption which are MOS:ACCESS issues. Bold edits do not need to be properly discussed with other editors before making them per WP:BOLD.
Regarding the specific point raised here, I don't edit things like that usually but I'd say that seems correct as each cell in a table should be able to be read independently, i.e. people should be able to read the writer column without having read the directors column first. Consistent with featured list List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Indagate (talk) 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]