Talk:1888 Atlantic hurricane season
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Hurricane 9 track image
Where is it? Why is there no track image for Hurricane 9? -- HurricaneERIC - Class of '08: XVII Maius MMVIII 21:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hurricane 9 wasn't even in the article until a few months ago ([1]). A track map was never created by Nilfanion's bot in 2006 even though it was in the database at that time... -- RattleMan 22:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
If anyone has this page watched, Hurricane 9 still needs a track map. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1888 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 06:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: SnowyRiver28 (talk · contribs) 11:42, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Nominator has sufficient authorship. No copyvio detected. Source spot check completed on multiple claims and passed. Sources are mainly databased/government publications.
Review
The cyclone weakened into a tropical depression around 06:00 UTC, and lost its identity just 12 hours later near Waco
this may be a standard way of describing storms, but 'losing its identity' seems strange here. Maybe 'losing its status as a...' would be better?In Massachusetts, many downed trees and flooded basements in the suburbs of Boston.
This doesn't read quite right to me.
Comments
Beginning review. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 11:42, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
@12george1: Great work! This article is almost ready to go. Please have a look at the notes I've made above and let me know if you have any questions or comments. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 05:51, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
@12george1: No rush, but just wanted to confirm you saw my above message ;) SnowyRiver28 (talk) 10:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
@SnowyRiver28: I did. In fact, I worked on that stuff a few days ago but forgot to tell you--12george1 (talk) 03:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! All issues fixed and article is good to go. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 10:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

