Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

FYI - you reverted a bunch of edits by a temporary account on List of Byzantine Emperors, and they were restored, along with the following message: And to Min968,I know that you changed all the Wikipedia pages I edited,where I replaced some photos with new ones,so how about you stop typing.I am personally begging you to stop. I've already left him several talk page messages, but I suspect this is another case of WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU. They know you did the action, but you failed to leave an edit summary, so all they are seeing is the undos. Please leave an edit summary next time, to improve the odds they'll understand what is going on. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 00:40, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Tarl N. In this case, I think this is vandalism. Min968 (talk) 03:46, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ahyup. I don't know if it was intentional vandalism, as much as butt-headed stubbornness and unaware of talk pages. Either way, they're well-blocked. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 21:13, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Zhu Youyuan is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 01:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article House of Zhu is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 02:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

So I understand what you mean, but as I'm not overly familiar with wikipedia's rules, how should I go about bringing the family section to the same style as the pages of all other Qing/Chinese emperors? I find the part about ancestors pointless here and better suited earlier in the article, the layout is a mess and there's outright wrong information (the biological fathers of adopted daughters are switched around). Is it alright as long as I keep all the sources? Maria0215 (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Maria0215 At the moment, I think you should leave the current state as it is and find sources for the new sections before making any edits. The general issue here is that the 'Family' section of the Qing emperors, as well as almost all Chinese emperors, lacks sources. Currently, I can only complete the Ming dynasty, except for the last two emperors. Min968 (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Min968, I plan on reviewing your GAs this weekend. I have been working on copyediting the Augustus article, which, as I think you know, is up for review. I have several articles of yours to review and I hope to have them all done within in the next 2 weeks. I might also suggest you nominate the article Government of the Ming dynasty, and I am willing to review it at a later date. Векочел (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Min968!

I noticed that you had reverted the edits which I made on the Song and Ming dynasty pages. Could you please tell me why you reverted them?

Thank You!

Oceanbed347 (talk) 12:02, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Yongle era is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 01:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that Hongwu Emperor, an article that you nominated at FAC, was archived again. I am sorry that this has happened.

When I was looking at your FAC stats, I noticed that you haven't reviewed any articles at FAC yet. I want to encourage you to review some articles there before making another nomination. Reviewing articles helps editors learn the FA criteria, even if they are experienced FA nominators like you. It also clears the list of nominations, making your nomination more likely to be picked by interested reviewers. Lastly, there are some editors (like me) who only review nominations from editors with high review-to-nomination stats, and reviewing articles builds goodwill amongst the FAC community.

As you know, reviews do not have to cover every aspect of the criteria. New reviewers can focus on one aspect, like jargon and readability, source checks, or copyediting. If you would like any feedback or help, feel free to reach out to me. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 23:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Zhu Zhifan has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Yongle Emperor's campaigns against the Mongols has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 15:06, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Wanli era has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 07:07, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bozhou rebellion has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 11:33, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]