Previous peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because since its previous one in 2014, it has been expanded drastically, many things have happened and since been added to the article with the best of my ability. I tried to remain as objective and informative as I could whilst providing information that I believed was useful/important to the article. It would be cool to get feedback!

Thank you, Watagwaan (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]