The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 17:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sennon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This fictional location does not establish notability independent of Age of the Five through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 03:29, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• comment what the material on this series needs is a decent job of writing, starting over entirely. I'm not even going to say my usual keep and improve, because what is needed is a description of the actual books in the first place, much more than fussing about how to handle the background. The possible need for specific articles is for later. DGG (talk) 04:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• improve, merge, redirect. Content should be saved for a rewrite. I was sorely tempted to !vote keep per nom. -- Mvuijlst (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (or merge) even within the series itself the country is not that notable and the Age of the Five series is not all that notable. Little or no real world impact, "sennon" "Ithiana" gets twenty Google hits. Icewedge (talk) 02:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect--sorry if that sounds contradictory. I don't know this 'series' (whatever it is) so I can't decide if this is a likely search term (you all make the call). Now, even without the benefit of knowledge about this topic, the content of the article is pretty much, ahem, not so good. Hence my delete, if the search term is deemed not likely enough. I hope I made myself clear! Drmies (talk) 04:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect The main article is short enough for a reduced amount of information on the fictional places to be merged with the main article. If no one can be bothered, it's still a reasonable search term. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that Somrey has already been redirected and that the others probably would have been if they didn't have different meanings as well. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.