- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:43, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Seishinkan Iaido (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced article about a martial art which, according to the article, has 6 schools worldwide, but dates back 470 years (according to the organization's website [1]). Fails both WP:GNG and WP:MANOTE. Jakejr (talk) 00:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Let's be clear - this is a small group which practices a style (Musō Jikiden Eishin-ryū) which has a very long and notable history. That of course does not mean this particular study group is. Notability is not inherited.Peter Rehse (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not a commonly enough practiced martial art to pass WP:MANOTE. Luchuslu (talk) 15:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge into Musō Jikiden Eishin-ryū as a modern school.MartialArtsLEO (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It's simply not practiced enough, taught enough, or covered enough to be notable. A mention, or even a merge, to its parent are is also an option though. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It lacks sources and any claims to notability.Mdtemp (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.