The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:41, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kuma-Ryu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indicaton of notability - made up style (Bear School?) Peter Rehse (talk) 21:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - References provided aren't very helpful without page numbers, and in one case, would appear to be original research as the source is a practitioner. One of the books in the reference section is avaialble for searching through Google Books but it does not mention "Kuma-Ryu" anywhere in it. See [1]. -- Whpq (talk) 21:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that none of the references refer to Kuma-ryu. They are common to George Dillman and related articles and these articles have no mention of Kuma-ryu.Peter Rehse (talk) 13:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete My search failed to turn up significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 00:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.