The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Koryu Uchinadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of reliable sources. None of the sources mentioned in the article discuss this martial art, and searches fail to find any non-primary sources. Worth noting that article was apparently created by a COI user (the founder of the style). Yunshui 雲水 09:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This appears to be a relatively new martial art which claims to have roots hundreds of years old, but no independent proof of that is given. The article gives no independent sources for any claim regarding this style--mentioning 19th century martial artists as people who led to the development of this art 100 years later has little to do with this style's notability. I found no independent evidence that shows this art meets any of the notability requirements at WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 17:20, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete My search found no independent sources that show this style passes any notability criteria. The COI issue is correct, but could be overlooked if notability was shown. Astudent0 (talk) 17:25, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.