The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 19:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Riddell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter - does not meet WP:NMMA or WP:KICK Peter Rehse (talk) 11:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete He doesn't meet the notability criteria for either MMA fighters or kickboxers. He also doesn't seem to have the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 04:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to kickboxing or delete as not notable yet. J947 19:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not meet the notability guidelines for kickboxers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.