This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer security: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with: Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information... Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here. Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• ... that syncing zombie cookies can create a evercookie clone?

• ALT1: ... that the practise of matching cookies could expose personally-identifiable information? Source: Papadopoulos, Panagiotis; Kourtellis, Nicolas; Markatos, Evangelos (2019-05-13). "Cookie Synchronization: Everything You Always Wanted to Know but Were Afraid to Ask". The World Wide Web Conference. WWW '19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. p. 1439. doi:10.1145/3308558.3313542. ISBN 978-1-4503-6674-8.
• ALT2: ... that cookie matching could compromise the encryption of VPNs? Source: Papadopoulos, Panagiotis; Kourtellis, Nicolas; Markatos, Evangelos (2019-05-13). "Cookie Synchronization: Everything You Always Wanted to Know but Were Afraid to Ask". The World Wide Web Conference. WWW '19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. p. 1439. doi:10.1145/3308558.3313542. ISBN 978-1-4503-6674-8.
• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Antiqua et nova

Sohom (talk) 23:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Overall: Prefer both ALT1 and ALT2 for general understandability for the main page audience, though I admit the term "zombie cookie" is a lot of fun. Will leave up to the promoter to decide which of the three they like best. Earwig pass with 2.0%. Next time you nominate, please remember to use "moved to mainspace" instead of created; it makes it easier for your future reviewers to look for that. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaesOfereode Will keep the "Moved to mainspace" message in mind. Regarding the hooks, We could do something like the following,

• ALT 3: ... that syncing zombie cookies can create a cookie that is almost impossible to crumble ?
• ALT 4: ... that syncing zombie cookies can create a cookie that is almost impossible to delete ?

Lmk if these would work better (I recognize that it still might be intelligible to a user if they are not familiar with web security/privacy, but still worth a try). Sohom (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sohom Datta: ALT4 is definitely fine with me. ALT3 is a little more opaque, but I wouldn't object to it being promoted. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]