This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

World Heritage Sites This page is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites

UNESCO has a different geoscheme to the united nations, so our articles on Lists of World Heritage Sites are original research. For example, Europe and North America are not considered separate according to UNESCO but we have separate articles for them. Should we merge these lists? I think yes because it is a violation of grouping together topics that have not be grouped together. I personally don't think that the combined articles would be too large, considering we have huge lists like Timeline of the far future. Many of the consensuses to split these articles happened more than a decade ago and were not that large, so I am coming here to ask if the appropriate decision was made. Easternsahara (talk) 23:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of World Heritage Sites in Spain for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Nebulatria (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:

• "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale."

There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower ^{Huddle • Handiwerk} 19:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)[reply]

I think it would be better if this became WikiProject UNESCO. The UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists exist and I think they are very similar to the current focus on World Heritage Sites. Various people who have contributed to featured or good content on WHS have also done to about ICH. I am not sure if it is possible to expand the scope of a WikiProject. Nonetheless, the current WikiProject is quite inactive, it has a couple of people working on content but most members are inactive. An expansion of scope may help combat this. Let me know if anyone would be interested. Sahib-e-Qiran 23:30, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WikiProject World Heritage Sites Members,

You are warmly invited to participate in Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Ramadan 2026 on the English Wikipedia.

This campaign focuses on improving content related to Ramadan, its history, traditions, culture, heritage, notable events, and global observances.

You can participate by creating new articles related to Ramadan and its associated topics. Your contributions will help bridge content gaps and improve coverage of Islamic culture and history on English Wikipedia.

There are also International Prizes for eligible participants.

Please visit the project page for full details, timeline, and guidelines: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Ramadan 2026.

We look forward to your participation. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 09:23, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]