Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red!

 Home Article alerts Essays Events Ideas & planning Images Join Metrics Outreach Redlist index Research Resources Showcase Social media Tools & tech 
Reaching a milestone of 20.130% on 23 Jun 2025, Women in Red changes notable women's representation on Wikipedia from red-linked obscurity to an encyclopedic presence.
Find us ...
Here:
or athttps://w.wiki/347

About

Welcome to Women in Red (WiR)! We are a group of volunteer (unpaid) editors of all genders who live around the world and belong to many different language and cultural communities. While our project extends over many language versions of Wikipedia, this page is principally devoted to our efforts on the English-language Wikipedia.

We focus on reducing systemic bias regarding gender representation (content gender gap) in the Wikipedia movement. Our goal is to "move the needle" in terms of statistical representation of women and other gender minorities on Wikipedia. We recognized a need for this work in 2014 when we learned that, as of October 2014, only 15.53% of English Wikipedia's biographies were about women.[1] Without a particular percentage in mind, we recognized that with persistence, we could increase it, one article at a time. With only this in mind, Women in Red was established in July 2015, at Wikimania Mexico City, by Roger Bamkin and Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight.

Women in Red is a very large, on-wiki-based community thanks to you, the editors who participate in our work. Did you know that it is also the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes? Join us!

20% milestone reached in mid-December 2024

See communication at 20% milestone

According to Humaniki, the percentage of women's biographies on the English Wikipedia is now over 20%: specifically reaching 20.003% by 16 December 2024. Using QLever, as of 9 February 2026, it had risen further to 20.29%. That means that of 2,113,767 biographies, only 428,938 are about women.[2] Not impressed? "Content gender gap" is a form of systemic bias, and WiR addresses it in a positive way through shared values.

Can we increase the percentage still further? Yes! But we need you in order to do so. How? There are more than 34,000 general forum comments from over 1,200 different editors on our talkpage.[3] Ask there. You don't have to be a member in order to participate in the conversations; just please be civil.

Do the articles have to be perfect when they are created? No. But establishing them according to Wikipedia's policies is the first step, and that's the focus of Women in Red: new article creation. Over time, other editors will improve these articles; maybe that's you.

Where the work is done

On Wikipedia

Our Wikipedia WikiProject focuses on creating content regarding women's biographies, women's works, and women's issues. Our editors create articles in many different language Wikipedias. The objective is to turn "redlinks" (like this one) into blue ones. That's why we are called "Women in Red".

We take an inclusive view towards subject matter, editors, and language communities:

  • Editors: We do not focus on the gender of the editor. Anyone/everyone is welcome to be a member, participant, enthusiast of Women in Red. If you participate in WiR, you can join up officially using the box in the top right-hand corner of this page. You are also welcome to add our userbox template {{User WikiProject Women in Red}} to your user page, to produce:
    This user is a participant in WikiProject Women in Red
  • Language communities: While Women in Red began on English Wikipedia, it is an international commitment with dozens of other language communities. Please add a link to your language's coordination page here.
  • Subject matter:
    • If the subject of the article self-identifies as a woman, a non-binary person, and/or any other gender minority, that person is included within the scope of Women in Red. Historic cases where it's unknown how they self-identified also count. The goal of the project is to increase inclusion, and we'd rather not block article subjects from being included in an article creation drive.
    • In addition to creating new articles, we create and maintain hundreds of lists of "missing" notable women. Some of these women have an article on some language Wikipedia, while others have no article in any Wikipedia. We call these lists, "redlists".
    • Click on our Redlinks index to see our lists of missing articles by focus area, occupation and nationality. Like everything else on Wikipedia, this is incomplete, so feel free to add pertinent items to our crowd-sourced lists.
    • While all redlists have redlinks, our redlists are generated in numerous ways:

Wikimedia Commons

"Sue"

Every year, our members upload thousands of images to Wikimedia Commons: photographs of women, their signatures, their works, etc. In turn, these images can be added to Wikipedia articles. This is another way people can be involved in improving women's representation on Wikipedia. Over 10,000 new images were added in 2022.

Wikidata

We create and improve Wikidata items related to women, women's works, and women's issues.

Announcements

Please post recent announcements directly on this page for improved page editing history, watcher alerts and greater visibility

Add new announcements to the top. Sign with ~~~~. Remove old ones after a couple of months.

Events

For a complete list of events, visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Events.

Ongoing initiatives

  • 2026 year-long initiative: #1day1woman: 2026
  • 2026 year-long initiative: Sports

    • New for this month

    • February 2026: Alphabet run: Countries starting with B
    • February 2026: Black women
    • February 2026: Works by Women: Opera, Theatre and Music

      • Recently completed

      • December 2025 – January 2026: Women who died: 2025
      • January 2026: Alphabet run: Countries starting with A

        • Upcoming events

        • March 2026: Alphabet run: Countries starting with C
        • March 2026: Artists+Activists
        • March 2026: Works by Women: Artworks

          • WiR works by filling in missing articles based on extensive lists of needed topics. The index to our wide range of topics and nationalities can be found at the Redlist index. Please make these red links blue. Notable women without a Wikipedia biography can be added to any crowd-sourced redlists they match; and added to wikidata such that they're included in wikidata-derived redlists. We also have a guide to adding names to redlists, and to creating new redlists.

          Article alerts

          See Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women for articles about women that are nominated for deletion.
          This section is a transcluded subpage, and may contain more information than is shown here. To view or edit, go to /Article alerts (watch this section).
          Note: This report is based on the {{WIR}} banners of WikiProject Women in Red. If an article isn't listed here, first verify that it has one of those banners. If it has another women-related banner, like {{WikiProject Women}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}} or {{WikiProject Women scientists}}, look on those projects' article alert pages instead.

          Did you know

          (6 more...)

          Articles for deletion

          (110 more...)

          Proposed deletions

          Good article nominees

          (5 more...)

          Requested moves

          Articles to be merged

          Articles for creation

          (2 more...)


          Declined drafts

          Thanks firstly to Ronhjones, and now to Galobtter, we have a bot showing declined drafts submitted to AfC. Weekly updates highlight those most recently listed under New Additions. With a little bit of attention, some of them could well be moved to mainspace, encouraging the editors who created them to progress on Wikipedia.

          Resources and research

          WiR maintains resources to help you contribute, including lists of topical books and external links, information on editing in general, and contacts you can reach out to for specific needs. They can be found at Resources.

          Academic research on Wikipedia's content gender gap is also documented at Research.

          Metrics

          This section is a transcluded subpage, containing more information than is shown here. To view detailed month-by-month results or to edit, go to Metrics.

          About: additional details

          The articles created for any month, including the current month, can be displayed by clicking on one of the months in the archive box.

          We track the articles we create each month. Reports bot updates these lists automatically, but you can manually add and annotate entries. The bot will remove non-existent pages. More details about the bot. Our metrics talkpage is here: Metrics talkpage

          The evolving list for this month (see Archives box) is created by the bot which lists new women's biographies on the basis of their female gender on Wikidata. At present, the bot does not list women's works, associations or related articles but you are encouraged to add these to the list manually.

          The graph shows the number of articles created each month. The apparent decrease for the current month reflects the number of articles created up to today's date. Only data on completed months indicate overall progress.

          For personal metrics on how many articles you've created about women, see this tool.

          Wikidata

          A WiR Wikidata page provides information on how you can help ensure WiR metrics are up-to-date.

          Totals at a glance

          Year Portion if
          applicable                     		Total Daily
          average
          2015 18 Jul – 31 Dec 11,711 70
          2016 28,399 77
          2017 28,271 77
          2018 27,323 75
          2019 27,207 75
          2020 30,119 82
          2021 26,780 73
          2022 18,893 52
          2023 17,925 49
          2024 20,142 55
          2025 18,854 52
          Grand total 255,624

          Updated: Rosiestep (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

          Summary of Women in Red statistics from main page

          Date Women Bios Percentage Increase in
           % for year          		 Increase
          in women
          for year          		 Increase
          in bios
          for year          		 Percentage
          for year
          30-Sep-2015 205,814 1,299,047 15.84%
          1-Jan-2017 240,445 1,432,907 16.78% 0.94% 34,631 133,860 25.87%
          1-Jan-2018 262,099 1,509,348 17.37% 0.58% 21,654 76,441 28.33%
          31-Dec-2018 279,959 1,573,341 17.79% 0.43% 17,860 63,993 27.91%
          30-Dec-2019 305,072 1,678,323 18.18% 0.38% 25,113 104,982 23.92%
          11-Jan-2021 332,622 1,778,126 18.71% 0.53% 27,550 99,803 27.60%
          3-Jan-2022 356,439 1,865,516 19.11% 0.40% 23,817 87,390 27.25%
          2-Jan-2023 373,263 1,921,359 19.43% 0.32% 16,824 55,843 30.13%
          1-Jan-2024 390,207 1,978,991 19.72% 0.29% 16,944 57,632 29.40%
          30-Dec-2024 408,840 2,042,975 20.01% 0.29% 18,633 63,984 29.12%
          31-Dec-2025 427,004 2,107,089 20.27% 0.26% 18,164 64,114 28.33%
          Total 4.43% 221,190 808,042 27.37%

          Notes:

          In October 2014 English Wikipedia had 1,445,021 biographical articles, according to a paper referenced on the project's main page. The number of biographies reported by Humaniki only caught up with this figure in 2017, which suggests that Humaniki information was incomplete until at least then.

          The September 2015 figure was reported here.

          The figure of 20% (408,183 women out of 2,040,570 biographies) was achieved in the 16 December 2024 update. TSventon (talk) 21:42, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

          Further background on metrics

          As a result of figures presented by Humaniki, we keep posting on the main Women in Red page the percentage of women's biographies on the English version of Wikipedia. Increases are steady but marginal: for example from July 2022 to July 2023, the percentage has risen from around 19.3% to around 19.6%.

          Thanks to an analysis presented by Andrew Gray on the WIR talk page, it certainly looks as if the number of men and women involved in sports has a significant influence on the statistics for women. A detailed account of Gray's work is presented in "Gender and BLPs on Wikipedia, redux", which he published on 2 August 2023.

          The two lists below show that biographies of living people (BLPs) born in recent years are approximately 50% female if data on all categories of athletes are excluded. By contrast, the equivalent overall figures (including athletes) are only around 25%. As a result, biographies of very large numbers of male sportspeople seem to be responsible for the huge difference. Andrew Gray's detailed lists below document how figures for BLPs by year of birth have evolved over the years:

          Overall development of BLPs since the 1920s for all biographies

          • Missing birth year BLPs – 150,574, of which 53,355 female – 35.4%
          • 1920s birth BLPs – 5,096, of which 1,325 female – 26.0%
          • 1930s birth BLPs – 39,055, of which 7,086 female – 18.1%
          • 1940s birth BLPs – 95,602, of which 18,495 female – 19.3%
          • 1950s birth BLPs – 128,518, of which 27,172 female – 21.1%
          • 1960s birth BLPs – 145,300, of which 33,390 female – 23.0%
          • 1970s birth BLPs – 150,539, of which 37,893 female – 25.2%
          • 1980s birth BLPs – 171,072, of which 42,880 female – 25.1%
          • 1990s birth BLPs – 150,880, of which 36,944 female – 24.5%
          • 2000s birth BLPs – 30,042, of which 7,542 female – 25.1%

          Development of BLPs since the 1920s for biographies excluding athletes

          If we discount all athletes using the infobox method, the results are:

          • Missing birth year BLPs – 140,177, of which 51,021 female – 36.4%
          • 1920s birth BLPs – 4,321, of which 1,228 female – 28.4%
          • 1930s birth BLPs – 28,978, of which 6,161 female – 21.2%
          • 1940s birth BLPs – 73,095, of which 16,566 female – 22.7%
          • 1950s birth BLPs – 95,893, of which 23,644 female – 24.7%
          • 1960s birth BLPs – 96,175, of which 26,632 female – 27.8%
          • 1970s birth BLPs – 81,682, of which 27,562 female – 33.7%
          • 1980s birth BLPs – 58,078, of which 24,816 female – 42.7%
          • 1990s birth BLPs – 23,281, of which 11,754 female – 50.5%
          • 2000s birth BLPs – 2,850, of which 1,539 female – 54.0%


          Showcase

          Main page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Showcase
          See also: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Recognized content

          WiR is amazing and has way too much to showcase here. Please see Showcase for our recent and past achievements.

          Recent Did You Know? blurbs

          Main page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/DYK

          These are the 20 most recent WP:DYK entries for WiR. Updated approximately weekly by User:JL-Bot.

          • ... that Liu Shasha didn't own a mobile phone because it might take away from her learning billiards? (2026-02-14)
          • ... that voice actor Rena Motomura prepared for an audition by practicing a single challenging line a hundred times a day? (2026-02-13)
          • ... that VTuber Sakamata Chloe used crowdsourcing for Christmas tree decorations? (2026-02-12)
          • ... that Variety once called Trisha Ziff a "photographer's photographer"? (2026-02-09)
          • ... that in 2002, Sarah Baxendale broke the Guinness World Record for the longest kiss featured on screen? (2026-02-07)
          • ... that zoologist Evelyn Shaw also worked in the catering industry alongside her husband? (2026-02-06)
          • ... that Thea Ehre performed nude at the 2021 Porn Film Festival Vienna? (2026-02-05)
          • ... that Gerta Hüttl-Folter became interested in Russian culture after staying with Maria Razumovsky's family while homeless? (2026-02-05)
          • ... that Allison Lanier traveled between New York and Los Angeles to film for her regular role on The Young and the Restless? (2026-02-03)
          • ... that Anahit Ananyan was credited with starting Armenia's tomato heritage? (2026-02-02)
          • ... that Emily Sutton illustrated an abridged children's edition of Shakespeare's First Folio with "red-cheeked gentlemen, sword-wielding warriors and ladies in striking attire"? (2026-01-31)
          • ... that philanthropist Dorothy Spotswood watered the concrete foundation for a new children's hospital? (2026-01-30)
          • ... that Patricia Allan had an abuser's name removed from the New Zealand Prayer Book? (2026-01-28)
          • ... that judge Coral Shaw announced her second retirement live on radio? (2026-01-24)
          • ... that Amy Cudden was credited as "Daniel Radcliffe's mum" on Am I Being Unreasonable? due to apparently looking like Harry Potter? (2026-01-24)
          • ... that Jan Ziff once wore a "World Tour" shirt showing every country United States Secretary of State James Baker had visited? (2026-01-23)
          • ... that Bernice Tongate was the model for one of the most well-known recruiting posters (pictured) for the American military during World War I? (2026-01-23)
          • ... that Christl-Marie Schultes resumed flying six months after losing her left leg in a plane crash? (2026-01-21)
          • ... that Paulina Tamayo, despite releasing fifteen albums, preferred direct contact with the public to a prolific discography? (2026-01-20)
          • ... that Michele Singer Reiner shot Donald Trump for his first book? (2026-01-20)

          Transcluding 20 of 3078 total

          Press

          There has been considerable press coverage of WiR, to the point where the project has its own Wikipedia article. Below are some recent articles. To add articles to the list, visit Press.

          Academia

          In addition to listings under Research, academic papers on gender bias in Wikipedia (as recorded in Wikidata) are listed in Scholia.

          To include a paper, create an item about it on Wikidata (check first to avoid duplicates) and give it main subject (P921) = gender bias on Wikipedia (Q17002416).

          References

          1. ^ Graells-Garrido, Eduardo; Lalmas, Mounia; Menczer, Filippo (2015). "First Women, Second Sex: Gender Bias in Wikipedia". Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media - HT '15: 165–174. arXiv:1502.02341. doi:10.1145/2700171.2791036. S2CID 1082360.
          2. ^ "Qlever".
          3. ^ "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red • en.wikipedia.org". XTools.
          allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WIRED