User talk:Metaviva
Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Nicosia Airport

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Battle of Nicosia Airport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ed [talk] [OMT] 19:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry for the automated warning! I don't think you could have seen the AfD, which was labeled for a different title (there were some moves before and during the AfD, if I remember correctly). Thanks for all your editing! Ed [talk] [OMT] 20:47, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @The ed17: Thank you for pointing out that AfD. Looking at it, isn't the consensus that of merger? In that case, wouldn't a redirect to a section of the merged article make sense? Best, Metaviva (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- It was later deleted after a sockpuppet recreated the article. I don't think we need a redirect here; not one source available on Google Books uses the phrase. Ed [talk] [OMT] 04:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Understandable. Thank you for maintaining Wikipedia! Metaviva (talk) 05:03, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- It was later deleted after a sockpuppet recreated the article. I don't think we need a redirect here; not one source available on Google Books uses the phrase. Ed [talk] [OMT] 04:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)