Hi Qubacubazamniauser! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank u I tried my best but thing I’m not trying do vandalism I’m trying to make simple edits page is missing Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sarah, Duchess of York. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

U aldready made lose edit privileges I asked fix something but u did not Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omega nugget and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qubacubazamniauser! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Asilvering was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

asilvering (talk) 05:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Princess Alexandra of Hohenlohe-Langenburg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have returned this to a redirect to her mother's article. Mia is a 10-year-old child who is not notable in her own right; notability is not inherited. The fact that she has been seen publicly in what anyone can recognize as a family situation (e.g., her great-grandparents' funerals) does not make her notable. Please do not create biographical articles of non-notable minor children of notable parents. Risker (talk) 06:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IT LOOKS LIKE I WAIT 20 WHOLE OTHER YEARS Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 08:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe longer. At this point, this child is the daughter of notable parents whose notability comes from their excellence in their chosen profession. The fact that her extended maternal family has a lot of very notable people is in no way a guarantee that she herself will become notable during her life. Risker (talk) 16:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WELL I CANT CREATE ANY ARCILE ALL THEM HARD FIND INFO I KNOW LOVE WIKEPDIA U LEADERS DRIVE ME CRAZY Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 01:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qubacubazamniauser. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Omega nugget, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s to hard make there’s no reference books or news or web so I want gone Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 13:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, Qubacubazamniauser. Creating a brand new article that will be accepted into the main space of the project is about the hardest task there is on Wikipedia. That's why we advise new editors to spend time improving existing articles when they first start, so they can learn about editing, references and Wikipedia's many policies and guidelines. It's not like Fandom where anyone can create an article, we have very tough standards here that are difficult to meet even if you have been an editor for many years. If you have questions about editing, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question I’m still learning some thing on Wikpedia so u how u delate articles prompt a article be good article bring back delated articles Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qubacubazamniauser. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Omega nugget".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Qubacubazamniauser, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 21:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Qubacubazamniauser! The thread you created at the Teahouse, I need help I don’t get it, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 04:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Princess Alexandra of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Llewee -- Llewee (talk) 14:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Princess Elisabeth of Hesse and by Rhine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 20:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Princess Elisabeth of Hesse and by Rhine you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Princess Elisabeth of Hesse and by Rhine and Talk:Princess Elisabeth of Hesse and by Rhine/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 06:21, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:32, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Princess Elisabeth of Hesse and by Rhine has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 23:26, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your work in getting the article Princess Alexandra of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to the prestigious GA status! Believe me when I say it's no easy task, that's why only 0.6% of the over 7 million articles English have been assessed this way. I gave the article a read and it's very well done: you should be really proud of your work 🙂 While I can't make you stay, I wanted to give you a gift for the road, and my appreciation for your hard work. Best of luck to you and God bless from North Carolina! Johnson524 09:05, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Qubacubazamniauser (talk) 02:02, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Princess Alexandra of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Llewee -- Llewee (talk) 21:23, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]