This user's talk page has archives: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Hi Anomie. There appears to be a minor typo on line 194, as an unnecessary ' is causing the SUL button to give an invalid link. Do you mind removing that? — Tenshi! (Talk page) 11:51, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Anomie⚔ 13:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 15:26, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the inclusion of Sir Nils Olav. 😀 Anomie⚔ 15:32, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you support at ANI, it is much appreciated. GiantSnowman 09:04, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year
	Happy New Year! May 2026 be your best year yet! BD2412 T 00:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

there are some issues with censorship that a fix for would be appreciated. first, mboxes break sometimes, for example on censorship article. second, some links aren't blue, as shown on my common.js. Oreocooke (talk) 04:27, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. It was screwing up TemplateStyles stylesheets, and not styling visited links blue. Anomie⚔ 12:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

thanks :) Oreocooke (talk) 06:42, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Could you revert your edit? I believe that's covered by de minimis. sapphaline (talk) 22:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Using the whole icon does not strike me as de minimis. You're welcome to continue the discussion around relicensing at Template talk:Sister project#Delinking icons if you want though. Anomie⚔ 23:25, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I didn't mean my GEOLINK question to be turned into a wasteful discussion about another topic. Thanks for closing. GoodDay (talk) 14:00, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad User:Gawaon decided they'd rather continue to argue over the other RFC after all. Anomie⚔ 00:51, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The good thing is that by continuing the discussion we arrived at a MOS-compatible solution that hadn't been considered before. Gawaon (talk) 03:02, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looks to me like people are still debating it there, despite that being a poor venue for anything besides "which parts should be linked". Anomie⚔ 13:22, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anomie, I noticed you blocked temporary account ~2026-36650-8 (talk · contribs) - thanks for that. Just as a heads up, this has been ongoing for a while at Expo 2025 pavilions, Expo 2025, Tech World pavilion, and other articles since at least July of last year. I've heavily contributed to two of these articles, or else I'd take administrative action myself, but just putting this out there in case you needed some context. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:52, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection might be a good place to ask. I'm not familiar with those articles to quickly evaluate the disruption there. Anomie⚔ 00:31, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anomie,

I just came across this bot which I wasn't aware of before. Is there any way you could program it to post a notification on the User talk page of the page creator for every user page it tags for speedy deletion? I realize that the editors who create CSD U6-eligible pages are considered to be inactive but should they ever return, a notice on their User talk page would at least alert them that one of their user pages was likely deleted. It's similar to what is done with User:DreamRimmer bot II and CSD G13s. Thank you for considering my request. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The difference between G13 and U6 is, as you noted, that the users with U6-able pages have not done anything outside of their userspace, while users creating G13-able pages have at least managed to find draftspace. Very likely most of these users are long gone and talk page messages would be pointless. If the community at large wants those messages posted anyway, I can add it, but absent evidence of that I'm going to decline. Anomie⚔ 03:53, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well, I appreciate your thoughtful explanation. I missed the entire discussion on the new "U" criteria when it occurred last year so it helps to understand a bit more about what editors were aiming for when they created it. Much appreciated. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	Wow, when I say you replied to me. I did not realize you were a real user thanks for the awesome BOT you have made Czarking0 (talk) 05:14, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]