Talk:Sanitary bin

Useful sources to expand

Lajmmoore (talk) 21:19, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/toilet-accommodation-approved-document-t
Look at diagram 3.1 on page 22
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cv2xly8vxreo Nicoli nicolivich (talk) 22:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 22:41, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sanitary bin, next to toilet
Sanitary bin, next to toilet
Converted from a redirect by Lajmmoore (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 126 past nominations.

Lajmmoore (talk) 21:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Will review this please.... interesting hooks, QPQ done, image free and clear. Whispyhistory (talk) 21:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    to proposed hook and to ALT1. The article reads well, is new enough and long enough. The hook fact of proposed hook is in the article and followed by a source written by someone who has researched the topic in detail. No copyvio problems. Hooks are both interesting. ALT1 is referenced in a source of non-English language but AGF. QPQ provided. No issues with image. Several red links in article. Have made a couple blue but could do with converting others. Thank you for your efforts. Whispyhistory (talk) 15:34, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Access dates - earlier version?

I'm puzzled by the access dates in 2024 in the first version of this page (dated March 2025). Is part of the text and refs drawn from somewhere else that should be credited, perhaps a section of another article? I don't see the access-dates in the corresponding Japanese article, which was my first thought. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:22, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Yngvadottir so I think this is explained by the fact I was working on this draft in my sandbox for several months prior to expanding the redirect in March (see this sandbox). If you've been nursing an article in your sandbox for a while, do you need to flag that? If so, how and where? Lajmmoore (talk) 19:52, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This also reminded me I didn't add a translation tag when I published the article, again because i pasted out of my sandbox. I totally should have done that. My bad. Lajmmoore (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, so it is partly based on translation. Thanks for placing the template. On the access dates when there's been a lot of user space work first, I think it would be best to revisit all the sources with access dates and then update them to the then current date; or alternatively, to note in an early edit summary (ideally the first, which is also the ideal for acknowledgement of the source of an interwiki translation) that earlier history can be found in your userspace, with a link such as the one you just gave. Thanks for the article! Yngvadottir (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Yngvadottir this all good advice and it's really helpful as I don't usually work in the sandbox. Happy editing! Lajmmoore (talk) 08:07, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sanitary_bin