Talk:Pussy Riot

Good articlePussy Riot has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 27, 2012Good article nomineeListed
April 7, 2025Good article reassessmentKept
In the newsNews items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on August 17, 2012, and December 24, 2013.
Current status: Good article

Cossacks?

Is it really that important to describe the security guards as Cossacks? I'm not sure what their identity has a people has to do with the crack down. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!19:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is used quite prominently in the sources cited.[1][2] Aircorn (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking about identity, you were probably thinking "Cossacks" as a people. In fact, they were self-styled Cossack militia in unforms and stuff, so yes, their "identity" was quite notorious. I fixed the article to clarify. --Altenmann >talk 19:42, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The lead is too long and detailed

The lead is supposed to be a summary. MOS:LEAD Jontel (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is recommended that leads be of one, two, three or four paragraphs which summarise the most important content of the article.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 16:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I trimmed it to a reasonable state. --Altenmann >talk 19:43, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Well, it looks like everyone was busy or didnt care, but the article still required a good deal of beating. For staters, I trimmed the lede from huge retelling of the article, so that now it looks like a lede. --Altenmann >talk 19:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 April 2025

On the Membership section, please correct misspellings in the first sentence of the third paragraph from "Samutsevich joined Voina 1n 2008, at the same time with Ailyokhina." and in the second sentence in the fifth paragraph from "Ailyokhinasai created her own show, Pussy Riot: Riot Days, which recounts her life as a Russian activist, and tours various fringe festivals." to "Alyokhina"2A02:2F04:B205:BD00:6D6E:4D04:24E7:1909 (talk) 07:22, 26 April 2025 (UTC) 2A02:2F04:B205:BD00:6D6E:4D04:24E7:1909 (talk) 07:22, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, please read "in 2008" 2A02:2F04:B205:BD00:6D6E:4D04:24E7:1909 (talk) 07:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done. In fact there were 3 cases of Ailyokhina. --Altenmann >talk 07:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

American or British English?

Which should be used in this article? The lead currently says the group was Founded in the fall of 2011 (American English; British would be "autumn") but also talks about Moscow's Cathedral of Christ the Saviour (British English; American would be "Savior"). No strong preference either way, just so long as we are consistent. (I'm aware many other varieties exist, but simplifying for the sake of this talk page). GnocchiFan (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extremist group in Russia

@Chiswick Chap I think the mention in the lead that Russia has designated the Pussy Riot group as an extremist is an important component, given that the group itself was organized in Russia. AlexeyKhrulev (talk) 11:48, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't. Everyone knows they are Russian, and that they have been treated harshly, so this is a detail for the text, not the lead. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:42, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Being designated as an extremist organization is qualitatively different from general repression or harsh treatment, as it constitutes a formal legal classification with concrete consequences such as criminal liability for association, censorship, and bans and, given that Pussy Riot originated in Russia and is closely associated with political protest against the Russian state, this official designation is directly relevant to understanding what legal status the group represents today. AlexeyKhrulev (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, someone has re-added it to the lead without discussing it here, despite the ongoing discussion and ignoring all policy, so let's forget about it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:56, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]