Longqing Emperor has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 21, 2025 Good article nominee Listed June 23, 2025 Good topic candidate Not promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. China Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why do some sources call the Longqing Emperor the twelfth emperor of the Ming Dynasty, but this article says he was the thirteenth? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 08:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Longqing Emperor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Min968 (talk · contribs) 14:52, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Векочел (talk · contribs) 20:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will start shortly. Векочел (talk) 20:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Min968 Do you have a source for the meaning of his era name? Векочел (talk) 00:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Векочел Source has been added. Min968 (talk) 06:10, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Min968 There remains one last uncited sentence, under the "Trade" section. Do you have a source for: The relaxation of legal restrictions resulted in a significant increase in trade? Векочел (talk) 12:34, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Min968 (talk) 13:18, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

On the whole, this is a well-written article about a short-lived emperor. Various elements of his reign, including his military and economic policies, are discussed and sourced. I am passing this now. Векочел (talk) 15:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]